• L' Eomot Inversé (9/2/2012)

    Well, the non-clustered index with included columns is an amusing concept, and I'm astounded that so many people (44% now) believe in such a fabulous beast.

    Not only do I believe in them, but I use them a lot as well. 🙂

    If you meant "clustered index with included columns", then I believe in those as well because a clustered index always includes all of its columns. So this should have counted as a correct answer. (The answer wasn't about clustered indexes with an INCLUDE clause in their definition, but clustered indexes with included columns)