• Hello, Tejaswini!

    It's okay to be confused. Not a problem. I appreciate the fact that you asked for more clarification.

    The point illustrated by #3 is, in itself the answer to #4.

    Part #3 of this series illustrated that a rollback command will rollback the transactions all the way to the outermost transaction. However, this does not mean that one cannot have logical "save points" that allow you to rollback to the most recent/outermost save point, provided the rollback is a conditional rollback. Without a save point, the rollback must go all the way to the outermost transaction - with named transactions, you cannot rollback to an inner transaction without a save point. That is the point illustrated by part #4.

    Hence, the following would have worked with respect to Part #4

    CREATE TABLE MyTable (MyId INT IDENTITY (1,1),

    MyCity NVARCHAR(50))

    BEGIN TRANSACTION OuterTran

    INSERT INTO MyTable VALUES ('Boston')

    BEGIN TRAN InnerTran

    INSERT INTO MyTable VALUES ('London')

    SAVE TRAN InnerTran

    INSERT INTO MyTable VALUES ('Paris')

    SELECT *,'Post Save' FROM MyTable

    ROLLBACK TRAN InnerTran

    SELECT *,'Post Rollback Inner Transaction' FROM MyTable

    ROLLBACK TRANSACTION OuterTran

    SELECT *, 'Post Rollback Outer Transaction' FROM MyTable

    DROP TABLE MyTable

    To get more clarity, what I would recommend is to play around with transactions for a while - there can be no better teacher than experience.

    Thanks & Regards,
    Nakul Vachhrajani.
    http://nakulvachhrajani.com

    Follow me on
    Twitter: @sqltwins