SQL Clone
SQLServerCentral is supported by Redgate
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 


SQL Server 2005


SQL Server 2005

Author
Message
Vinay Thakur-585143
Vinay Thakur-585143
SSCrazy
SSCrazy (2.6K reputation)SSCrazy (2.6K reputation)SSCrazy (2.6K reputation)SSCrazy (2.6K reputation)SSCrazy (2.6K reputation)SSCrazy (2.6K reputation)SSCrazy (2.6K reputation)SSCrazy (2.6K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 2631 Visits: 795
Comments posted to this topic are about the item SQL Server 2005

Thanx.
Vinay


http://rdbmsexperts.com/Blogs/
http://vinay-thakur.spaces.live.com/
http://twitter.com/ThakurVinay
Joy Smith San
Joy Smith San
SSChampion
SSChampion (10K reputation)SSChampion (10K reputation)SSChampion (10K reputation)SSChampion (10K reputation)SSChampion (10K reputation)SSChampion (10K reputation)SSChampion (10K reputation)SSChampion (10K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 10032 Visits: 3207
Thanks. To be frank I was not aware about it.
And I have never seen anybody using it as well.
Davide Lonardoni
Davide Lonardoni
SSC Veteran
SSC Veteran (290 reputation)SSC Veteran (290 reputation)SSC Veteran (290 reputation)SSC Veteran (290 reputation)SSC Veteran (290 reputation)SSC Veteran (290 reputation)SSC Veteran (290 reputation)SSC Veteran (290 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 290 Visits: 115
And according to BOL is already obsolete. Btw anybody find it useful?
SA-1
SA-1
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame (3.8K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.8K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.8K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.8K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.8K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.8K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.8K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.8K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 3781 Visits: 944
I didn't realize that it was already obsolete up until now. I have tested this for a very large DW and have seen significant disk space savings.
Steve Jones
Steve Jones
SSC Guru
SSC Guru (224K reputation)SSC Guru (224K reputation)SSC Guru (224K reputation)SSC Guru (224K reputation)SSC Guru (224K reputation)SSC Guru (224K reputation)SSC Guru (224K reputation)SSC Guru (224K reputation)

Group: Administrators
Points: 224715 Visits: 19637
It was introduced for data warehouses and cubes, offering savings if you store significant amounts of decimal data.

Follow me on Twitter: @way0utwest
Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
My Blog: www.voiceofthedba.com
hakan.winther
hakan.winther
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame (3.7K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.7K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.7K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.7K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.7K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.7K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.7K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.7K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 3655 Visits: 612
I found it usefull in a large database on a server with many CPU:s and I/0 bottleneck, but now we have replaced it with table compression in SQL server 2008, and it is much more usefull. (We have 4 quad processors Smile )

/Håkan Winther
MCITPBigGrinatabase Developer 2008
MCTS: SQL Server 2008, Implementation and Maintenance
MCSE: Data Platform
Tom Thomson
Tom Thomson
SSC-Dedicated
SSC-Dedicated (36K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (36K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (36K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (36K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (36K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (36K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (36K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (36K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 36123 Visits: 12792
It's hard to understand why MS introduced this storage format - perhaps they hadn't yet decided to provide table compression in the next version when they did this (although one would thing SQL2008 was in a pretty advanced stage by the time SQL2005 SP2 content was defined). Using a long format + compression (store the affected tables on a compressed partition in older or less facility-rich SQLServer versions ; use SQL table compression if you have the right SQL version) is going to be far cleaner and give greater savings almost always. Of course if you have a very large very sparse matrix of decimal values, and want to store it in fully expanded form (ie as if it were not sparse) in a table it's possible that vardecimal might do as well as or maybe even better than compression, but (a) I think it's unlikely that vardecimal actually would do better and (b) I really can't imagine anyone wanting to do that.

Tom

Go


Permissions

You can't post new topics.
You can't post topic replies.
You can't post new polls.
You can't post replies to polls.
You can't edit your own topics.
You can't delete your own topics.
You can't edit other topics.
You can't delete other topics.
You can't edit your own posts.
You can't edit other posts.
You can't delete your own posts.
You can't delete other posts.
You can't post events.
You can't edit your own events.
You can't edit other events.
You can't delete your own events.
You can't delete other events.
You can't send private messages.
You can't send emails.
You can read topics.
You can't vote in polls.
You can't upload attachments.
You can download attachments.
You can't post HTML code.
You can't edit HTML code.
You can't post IFCode.
You can't post JavaScript.
You can post emoticons.
You can't post or upload images.

Select a forum

































































































































































SQLServerCentral


Search