October 31, 2005 at 2:07 am
October 31, 2005 at 2:44 am
Offcourse you'll have to check execution plans, but the optimizor will see trough it (I hope) ![]()
This would result in a query like this : ![]()
select P.TypeId
, max(P.TypeDescription) as TypeDescription
, max(T.TxDate) as maxTxDate
from TypeParemeter P
inner join transactions T
on P.TypeID = T.TypeID
group by P.TypeID
So you'd prefer ![]()
select P.TypeId, P.TypeDescription , T.maxTxDate
from TypeParemeter P
inner join
( select TypeID, max(TxDate) as maxTxDate
from transactions
group by TypeID ) T
on P.TypeId = T.TypeId
Check the execution plans and times ! ![]()
And evaluate readability ! (you may not be the only one to support this query, so document it well if it's perpose and devision is not readable by nature) ![]()
Johan
Learn to play, play to learn !
Dont drive faster than your guardian angel can fly ...
but keeping both feet on the ground wont get you anywhere :w00t:
- How to post Performance Problems
- How to post data and code to get the best help
- How to prevent a sore throat after hours of presenting ppt
press F1 for solution, press shift+F1 for urgent solution 😀
Need a bit of Powershell? How about this
Who am I ? Sometimes this is me but most of the time this is me
October 31, 2005 at 5:34 am
October 31, 2005 at 5:37 am
I'ts always a nice adventure to predict an execution plan yourself and then compare it to the one sqlserver uses ![]()
You'll learn a lot from it.
Johan
Learn to play, play to learn !
Dont drive faster than your guardian angel can fly ...
but keeping both feet on the ground wont get you anywhere :w00t:
- How to post Performance Problems
- How to post data and code to get the best help
- How to prevent a sore throat after hours of presenting ppt
press F1 for solution, press shift+F1 for urgent solution 😀
Need a bit of Powershell? How about this
Who am I ? Sometimes this is me but most of the time this is me
November 1, 2005 at 3:05 am
i dont think "nice adventure" is quite the term i'd use ...!! ![]()
November 1, 2005 at 8:45 am
I think I agree with Vinny
November 1, 2005 at 9:38 am
Hi,
I use temp tables. I have a report that does statistics on data and many kinds of grouping have to be implemented. Some things have to be groupped before additional processing. I am not sure about the performance. These queries have to be run once in a quarter, so I did not investigate this side of using temp tables.
Regards,Yelena Varsha
November 2, 2005 at 12:14 am
Well, lets just say it is a "must do" to get a feeling with your rdbms.
If you ignore execution plans, or the investigation regaring how and why your rdbms uses a certain plan, you'll miss a lot of knowlage to avoid bottlenecks in your system.
Yelena,
It didn't pop into my mind to mention temp objects to solve this query. ![]()
Also there, it's mandatory to test end check. ![]()
.... and only use it when needed .
Johan
Learn to play, play to learn !
Dont drive faster than your guardian angel can fly ...
but keeping both feet on the ground wont get you anywhere :w00t:
- How to post Performance Problems
- How to post data and code to get the best help
- How to prevent a sore throat after hours of presenting ppt
press F1 for solution, press shift+F1 for urgent solution 😀
Need a bit of Powershell? How about this
Who am I ? Sometimes this is me but most of the time this is me
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply