BWAAAA-HAAAAA!!!!!  I was just thinking that and also thinking "thank goodness it wasn't XML". 😉

I'm also thinking they HAD to name the way they did or their recommendations for keys and includes would very quickly outstrip the 128 character object limit if actual column names were used... especially with how some people name columns.  At least they used something logical that could actually be split and rendered to come up with the column names.

Of course, Index001, Index002, etc, might not have been the end of the world.