Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 136 total)
Why don't you just throw away the starting balance and only keep the ending balance in the table? Keeping redundant data like this is almost asking for inconsistencies to develop.
June 10, 2003 at 10:43 am
We went round and round with a similar problem back in January. I stumbled on the following way to make it work: On each client, I ran the Client Network...
June 10, 2003 at 9:22 am
quote:
Do you run named instance of SQL Server 2000?
Nope.
quote:
May 21, 2003 at 10:20 am
quote:
You may post your problems here and we could help you to resolve them.
I did...
May 20, 2003 at 3:05 pm
quote:
As client machine, you can have higher version of MDAC and be able to perform anything as before.
May 19, 2003 at 1:38 pm
Tell them telephones aren't needed either, but they sure do save a lot of time & money. And THEY cost a LOT more than comments.
March 6, 2003 at 1:56 pm
I believe you are preaching to the choir, Brian. But I suspect such issues will be just as much ignored by this "NT guru" as previous arguments were.
Plain & simple,...
February 24, 2003 at 11:44 am
FYI for anyone interested: Two MS KB articles are very informative. And it turns out a startup proc is not recommended by MS; and this situation existed in 7.0...
February 18, 2003 at 12:48 pm
After some more pain & suffering, I have discovered that when SQL Server 2000 (SP3) starts up, msdb is set to Simple mode a little bit AFTER the startup procs...
February 17, 2003 at 12:16 pm
quote:
Besides a blank sa password, recently I ran across one of the worst securityholes I have ever seen. While recently helping...
February 13, 2003 at 9:47 am
Good point, although I was referring to code that documents itself, not external comments.
But since you brought it up, I've wrestled with the same question time after time, and come...
February 13, 2003 at 8:34 am
quote:
According to Microsoft,A SQL statement without a where clause will not use indexes, so how can it be faster putting joins in...
February 10, 2003 at 11:43 am
quote:
I really see no reason to have MSDB in "FULL" mode. It is not a transaction heavy database. And what sort of...
February 6, 2003 at 12:57 pm
quote:
Upgrade to SQL Server 2000 also upgrades MDAC to 2.6. This may related to your problem. Try to upgrade MDAC component to...
February 4, 2003 at 3:24 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 136 total)