Viewing 15 posts - 691 through 705 (of 1,221 total)
GSquared (7/25/2008)
July 25, 2008 at 9:45 am
I defined Bobby in my joke because we're an international audience here. Most Americans know what a Bobby is, obviously the Brits and probably any country that was previously...
July 25, 2008 at 9:42 am
Shaun McGuile (7/25/2008)
You wouldn't put IIS and SQL Server on the same physical hardware that's just asking for trouble.;)
You can, I have, in fact I did it twice. I...
July 25, 2008 at 9:17 am
I was also working the problem with the Phoenix SQL Server group on their email list, and someone mentioned that they'd never been able to get files with mixed record...
July 25, 2008 at 8:39 am
blandry (7/24/2008)
July 25, 2008 at 8:32 am
Found the reason for the problem, not sure how I'm going to solve it. Apparently it's a buffering problem: the header record is 80 characters, the detail records are...
July 24, 2008 at 5:04 pm
I think it's a buffering problem. At the suggestion of our ERP manager, I tried it as a sequential flow: SQL truncate table, import file, DTS parse header, import...
July 24, 2008 at 4:53 pm
Unfortunately I can't lop off rows because the mapping then fails since the header record and detail records have different layouts.
I did just learn something interesting, though. I created...
July 24, 2008 at 9:58 am
Shaun McGuile (7/24/2008)
Father Ted!:D
To the rest of the world its comedy, to the irish its serious drama 😉
Cath...
July 24, 2008 at 9:56 am
Charles Cherry (7/24/2008)
Isn't SQL licensed by processor? Or maybe it used to be...
There are two licensing schemes, unless they've changed it behind my back: per cpu, and per seat. ...
July 24, 2008 at 9:40 am
Almost all of our hardware is from Dell, and apparently the Windows Server software is bound to the hardware. It wouldn't apply if you're under a Windows bulk licensing...
July 24, 2008 at 9:31 am
I forgot another comment that I meant to reply to. Some costs can be hidden and quite high: a lot of the servers sitting in your rack might have...
July 24, 2008 at 9:09 am
We've just begun investigating this and have three servers for ESX along with about 10 TB of two new SANs for it. We have a lot of servers we...
July 24, 2008 at 9:04 am
Unfortunately I can't do that because the detail record layout is different than the header record, and with the mapping changing the import fails.
July 24, 2008 at 8:32 am
That looks very neat, but considering the cost of getting into Management Server, I doubt we'll ever see it here.
July 23, 2008 at 12:17 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 691 through 705 (of 1,221 total)