Viewing 15 posts - 361 through 375 (of 609 total)
Here is my finding can some shedsome light on it. If i replace the below qry with code in * it run only in 2 sec comapred to 16min. any...
March 5, 2010 at 8:18 am
from the execution plan is see that #revdates has the following
actual number of rows = 3426054035
estimated rows = 643743
when i...
March 5, 2010 at 7:38 am
do you see any problem in the above query and why it is scannig more records than required ?
March 2, 2010 at 10:32 am
Here is what i found, the tem table #revdate has only half million records but in the execution plan is that it is scanning more than 250 million records, how...
March 2, 2010 at 7:27 am
yes server /hardware are same and when you say slow qry temp table is large may i know how did you find that because technically it should be small as...
March 2, 2010 at 6:48 am
yes you are right, i see an index misssing at this point am not sure how that index is missing i may have to research but that is from the...
March 1, 2010 at 6:31 pm
as i said bot hare idential except the slow qry is a smaller database comapred to fast_qry and here is hte count of #revdates table respectively.
slow_qry = 454080
fast_qry =...
March 1, 2010 at 5:16 pm
I am adding 2 plans as attachements both are completely identical but one is lsow and the other is fast.
query is a simple query and index are also rebuilt on...
March 1, 2010 at 4:52 pm
steve
what format of execution plan you are looking into ?
March 1, 2010 at 2:35 pm
I am not looking to tune the query but would like to dignosis the issue why same query can run faster on larger database compared to smaller database.
March 1, 2010 at 2:13 pm
I am not doubting the query but looking for exact reason why same query performs diffrent way on both databases which are similar except the size.
March 1, 2010 at 1:36 pm
How can a user run Database Tuning Advisor without having db_owner previalges ?
February 23, 2010 at 2:03 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 361 through 375 (of 609 total)