Viewing 15 posts - 2,341 through 2,355 (of 2,469 total)
Ron - at some point if someone decides to place the clustered index on another column then that's the one that will be "ordered by" IF THERE ARE NO OTHER...
May 12, 2005 at 12:40 pm
Alors...then can we move on to my original request for additional article/s on order/priority of clustered/nonclustered index scanning order?!
Chris - I get the impression that you're in cahoots with Andy/Steve...
May 12, 2005 at 12:00 pm
(3 ligne(s) affectée(s))....
No - you've never spoken it....just copied and pasted sometimes with french thrown in....
& before you take this too seriously...I was only teasing when I said that!
May 12, 2005 at 11:44 am
It's been a laborious and painstaking exercise but I spent all morning creating and testing a dummy table with 3 combinations of 2 columns - clustered and unique nonclustered; clustered...
May 12, 2005 at 11:04 am
Joel - thanks for throwing that in - I certainly do not have more than a few thousand rows in all the tables I've tested so far...
May 12, 2005 at 7:59 am
Yes - the second one was that defining primary keys do not necessarily mean a clustered index UNLESS (cutting & pasting from BOL to make life easier....):
"IF a clustered index...
May 12, 2005 at 7:36 am
Remi - I KNEW you would ask that & I should've addressed that first...
No - I did not since I already had the setup to run queries...I can see what's...
May 12, 2005 at 7:23 am
I have a table with an ID PK clustered index column...everytime I query it (regardless of whether my select includes the indexed column or any other combination of columns) I...
May 12, 2005 at 7:13 am
No - to which one Frank ?
May 12, 2005 at 6:56 am
The filtering and validation should be done on the client side - can you not do this ? Splly. the dd & mm..
May 12, 2005 at 6:51 am
Chris - doesn't a clustered index ensure that the rows are always returned in the order based on the indexed column ?!
Also - a primary key doesn't implicitly mean...
May 12, 2005 at 6:08 am
or you have a clustered index ?!?!
May 12, 2005 at 5:09 am
I tried this on one of our tables with about 7000 rows - running on a VERRRRRRY SLOW network - when the index wasn't clustered it took 22 seconds -...
May 11, 2005 at 8:08 am
Remi - you're amazing!
Haven't had time to compare execution plans yet (bet you already have) - but for sheer brevity and elegance your t-sql...
May 11, 2005 at 7:20 am
Viewing 15 posts - 2,341 through 2,355 (of 2,469 total)