Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 582 total)
Well I think it was where there isn't a matching key/date.
The query (+principle of charity) backs you, the data (+ same) backs me. We may never know....
June 8, 2006 at 11:49 am
Peter, yours will keep repeating the same update, too
June 8, 2006 at 11:46 am
I'm afraid there's a silly @cnt in your code, which just gets bigger and doesn't do anything else. There is nothing in the code to tell it which records have...
June 8, 2006 at 11:41 am
June 8, 2006 at 11:34 am
in SQL8+, you could put the results in a varaible and wait until everything else is done before returning it. You could supress the rst at the source, rather than...
June 8, 2006 at 11:27 am
where does the aggregation occur? Can you give us an outline of the query?
eg
select col1, min(x) from
(select col1, id from t3 where x
union
select.col1, max(id)-min(id) from t4 group by col1...
June 8, 2006 at 10:48 am
perhaps:
UPDATE A SET
June 8, 2006 at 10:42 am
June 8, 2006 at 10:22 am
Return the resultset last. Why does the sp succeed even though one of its OA calls fail?
June 8, 2006 at 9:15 am
Yes - SQL injection only occurs where free text entered by the user is concatenated into a SQL string for dynamic execution.
June 8, 2006 at 7:40 am
I know you may need rich or adaptable regexes, but if it's just for checking email addresses, you should at least bear in mind that you can also use LIKE which...
June 8, 2006 at 6:41 am
If were just a question of applying parameters, you wouldn't need the dynamic SQL. Presumably you want to issue a command which involves a DB in non-subsitutable position. Is the verification against...
June 8, 2006 at 6:14 am
UNION removes all exact duplicates from the concatenated recordset. This involves a sort. If you won't have or don't mind dupes, use UNION ALL which is a straight concetenation.
June 8, 2006 at 6:05 am
Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 582 total)