Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 432 total)

  • RE: Normalization

    Tom.Thomson (5/10/2011)


    Well, presumably one of the applicable values that a-null could be is 0, and it surely is not true that 0/0 delivers 0 (it should deliver something like "error:...

  • RE: SQL Safety Nets

    Eric M Russell (6/20/2011)


    That's strange. In my observable universe, SQL Server and Oracle support declarative data integrity, meet business needs, EAV tables exist only within the realm of niche applications,...

  • RE: SQL Safety Nets

    Eric M Russell (6/14/2011)


    MS SQL and Oracle are first and formost relational database engines. If Microsoft thinks NoSQL datbase solutions are a market worth breaking into, then I'd expect...

  • RE: Normalization

    Belatedly I realised that normalization isn't entirely defeated by Codd tables without keys. Given the definition of JDs already discussed, the Codd table T(a) would satisfy the JD * (a,{})...

  • RE: Normalization

    Tom.Thomson (4/27/2011)


    Ted Codd


    There are two options:

    1. warn users not to use tautologies as conditions in their...

  • RE: Normalization

    Tom.Thomson (4/28/2011)


    The problem, David, is that Steven (and maybe also you) are saying plainly and clearly that Date's definition (quoted by Gus) is wrong; but it is completely correct...

    I shouldn't...

  • RE: Normalization

    Tom, thank you very much for your thoughtful and thorough response to my post. For me you have made this thread worth continuing. I will mull over your reply and...

  • RE: Normalization

    GSquared (4/27/2011)


    I'm not asking you to define "relational", I'm asking you to defend the proposition that "rows that have a value in them which indicates the order of the rows...

  • RE: Normalization

    GSquared (4/27/2011)


    On the circular reason point, saying "all relations are in 1NF, thus this is automatically in 1NF because we say it's a relation", is circular reasoning. It's not...

  • RE: Normalization

    GSquared (4/27/2011)


    Whom have I insulted and when?

    You think that people aren't going to be insulted when you say they are "psychotic" if they hold a particular point of view?

    GSquared (4/27/2011)


    As...

  • RE: Normalization

    GSquared (4/27/2011)


    So what you're saying is that the rule about rows not having a specified order was written just to take up space. Since it's physically impossible for a...

  • RE: Normalization

    David Burrows (4/27/2011)


    David & Steven,

    If, as you state, the DDL in question does conform to Date's 1NF as in 'There's no top-to-bottom ordering to the rows' can you post example...

  • RE: Normalization

    GSquared (4/27/2011)


    I say the rows in that table are "ordered" because there's a column that specifically determines the order of the rows. Look at the table design, it's right...

  • RE: Normalization

    Tom.Thomson (4/26/2011)


    David Portas (4/26/2011)


    Now you are being silly. No one said nulls are "evil" or objected to them for "religious" or dogmatic reasons. The objections are about the practical disadvantages...

  • RE: Normalization

    GSquared (4/26/2011)


    My objection to this whole debate is the introduction of "authority" into it. My whole point is that citing authority is silly. Yes, I cited authority, then...

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 432 total)