Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 432 total)
Jeff Moden (1/30/2010)
January 30, 2010 at 5:19 pm
Jeff Moden (1/29/2010)
January 30, 2010 at 3:19 am
I think you are asking the wrong question. Information can always be represented either with or without nulls. When designing a database you have to make a choice about whether...
January 29, 2010 at 12:32 pm
You could also use EXCEPT. This query returns any rows in B that aren't also in A:
SELECT * FROM B
EXCEPT
SELECT * FROM A;
January 27, 2010 at 3:19 pm
Jeff Moden (1/23/2010)
Jeff Moden (1/23/2010)
So, when YOU create an address table, do you have a "second address" line or do you normalize it? Enquiring minds want to know. 🙂
I'd...
January 24, 2010 at 4:21 am
RBarryYoung (1/23/2010)
David Portas (1/22/2010)
January 23, 2010 at 4:19 pm
Nothing personal. I just wanted to set the record straight, keeping in mind your comments about reading what is not there and stretching the meaning of words beyond their author's...
January 23, 2010 at 11:31 am
PaulB-TheOneAndOnly (1/22/2010)
January 22, 2010 at 4:33 pm
abhishes (1/20/2010)
I am doing a presentation for all the features of SQL Server, and one of topics is SQL CLR.
Intensive byte level operations within large objects are hard or impossible...
January 22, 2010 at 12:57 pm
PaulB-TheOneAndOnly (1/21/2010)
I can see no conflict between data normalization and accepting null values in non-key columns - as all rdbms out there allow and enforce.
All the conventional Normal Forms apply...
January 22, 2010 at 9:16 am
PaulB-TheOneAndOnly (1/20/2010)
just can't defend a physical model 1-1 relationship in an scenario that calls for a 0/n-0/1 at the domain model level, init?
Of course I agree. However in a scenario...
January 20, 2010 at 7:53 am
So your only answer to my question is to tell me that I'm not asking the right question. Right...
You can invent an exception to any business rule you care...
January 20, 2010 at 7:15 am
PaulB-TheOneAndOnly (1/20/2010)
January 20, 2010 at 6:47 am
PaulB-TheOneAndOnly (1/20/2010)
When I say 1-1 relationship I'm not saying 1-0/1; I'm saying 1-1 and I insist that a 1-1 relationship most certainly means something is deadly wrong.
What is "wrong" with...
January 20, 2010 at 6:22 am
PaulB-TheOneAndOnly (1/19/2010)
1) A design that ends up with two or more tables having a 1-1 relationship most of the time means something is wrong.
Why?
It is true that such relationships between...
January 20, 2010 at 5:49 am
Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 432 total)