Viewing 15 posts - 421 through 435 (of 5,394 total)
matthew.green 36969 (6/12/2015)
using the app lock sp - basically queues up the calls to proc so only 1 user...
June 12, 2015 at 2:33 am
You have concurrency issues because your code reads the recordid before writing to the table and locking it, so multiple connections could read the same recordid under the default transaction...
June 12, 2015 at 2:00 am
Grant Fritchey (6/11/2015)
Real life badass, Dracula, Saruman, Christopher Lee is no more
Sad news. Great actor.
June 11, 2015 at 6:44 am
Wild guess is that the index was not covering and you got the classic lookup deadlock SQL Server is (in)famous for.
SNAPSHOT isolation is usually the cure for this desease.
June 11, 2015 at 3:57 am
I agree that ARITHABORT is a false fix, but hardcoding a hint is the last resort in my opinion.
I would rather focus on understanding which cardinality estimation goes wrong when...
June 11, 2015 at 2:56 am
I had to replace my windshield twice last year. Twice in two months to be precise. Not funny.
A small rock in the motorway is enough to break it and even...
June 10, 2015 at 10:01 am
Ed Wagner (6/10/2015)
Do you see the difference in what Gail did?
I do: she fixed my mistake 🙂
June 10, 2015 at 9:52 am
Try this:
EXEC adasdb.master.sys.sp_executesql 'RESTORE DATABASE ETLNewTest FROM DISK = ''g:\MSSQL11.MSSQLSERVER\MSSQL\ETL_663.bak''';
Any difference?
June 10, 2015 at 9:14 am
Those stats are created automatically by SQL Server. If you want to replace them with custom statistics, you can do it.
June 9, 2015 at 10:47 am
ARITHABORT is a client setting that can be changed at any moment.
If you change your SSMS connection setting and clear the cache for that plan ( DBCC FREEPROCCACHE(plan_handle) ) does...
June 9, 2015 at 9:12 am
g.britton (6/9/2015)
Now, I have to figure out why the first, good plan was not resused and a second, bad plan was compiled instead.
If you correlate the plan from...
June 9, 2015 at 8:50 am
At a glance, looks like the previous installation of service pack 3 failed to update the binaries, which is quite weird.
Adding more nodes to a SQL 2005 cluster has always...
June 9, 2015 at 7:47 am
The SQL Agent job is probably running a different execution plan compared to the one you get when you run the query in SSMS.
The reason might be one among:
* stale...
June 9, 2015 at 7:28 am
Viewing 15 posts - 421 through 435 (of 5,394 total)