Viewing 15 posts - 2,416 through 2,430 (of 5,394 total)
Vishal.Gajjar (10/27/2011)
Generally, When a statement is used inside a stored procedure, it's not going to change and...
October 27, 2011 at 4:11 am
ChrisM@Work (10/27/2011)
Gianluca Sartori (10/27/2011)
Strange coincidence!...
Nah - you're strange, I'm a coincidence 😛
:hehe: Quite right.
October 27, 2011 at 4:07 am
I think that the misinformation comes from good advice that turned into bad advice with new SQLServer versions.
In SQL Server 2000 we did not have "plan cache", there was just...
October 27, 2011 at 3:35 am
jcrawf02 (10/26/2011)
missed a couple user group meetings I meant to get to (online), would...
October 27, 2011 at 1:17 am
Great question, Paul, and great explanation.
Looks like you tricked most of us (myself included).
October 27, 2011 at 1:13 am
WayneS (10/26/2011)
SQLRNNR (10/26/2011)
WayneS (10/26/2011)
SQLRNNR (10/26/2011)
Congrats to Wayne for winning the TSQL Challenge
Thanks Jason.
Like I said in my blog[/url], I only submitted the winning entry... SQL Server 2012 is the winner...
October 26, 2011 at 4:06 pm
GilaMonster (10/26/2011)
BrainDonor (10/26/2011)
GilaMonster (10/26/2011)
BrainDonor (10/26/2011)
October 26, 2011 at 4:03 pm
Another possible solution:
DECLARE
@Param1 varchar(50),
@Param2 varchar(50),
@Param3 varchar(50),
@Param4 varchar(50),
@Param5 varchar(50),
@Param6 varchar(50),
@Param7 varchar(50),
@Param8 varchar(50),
@Param9 varchar(50),
@Param10 varchar(50)
SELECT
@Param1 = NULL,
@Param2 = 'Value1',
@Param3 = NULL,
@Param4 = NULL,
@Param5 = 'Value2',
@Param6 = NULL,
@Param7 = NULL,
@Param8 = NULL,
@Param9...
October 26, 2011 at 6:27 am
MysteryJimbo (10/26/2011)
Gianluca Sartori (10/26/2011)
However, you could try to issue DBCC FREESYSTEMCACHE('All') before shrinking. This flushes the system cache,...
October 26, 2011 at 3:40 am
Ninja's_RGR'us (10/25/2011)
What's wrong with msforeachdb?
Well, something, actually.
You could use Aaron Bertrand's replacement[/url] or my humble attempt[/url].
October 26, 2011 at 2:34 am
I agree that shrinking tempdb may not be is not a good idea.
However, you could try to issue DBCC FREESYSTEMCACHE('All') before shrinking. This flushes the system cache, including internal objects...
October 26, 2011 at 2:23 am
Is that a limitation in the ASP code?
In SQLServer, under many circumnstances, views are updateable, so it would be no problem.
October 24, 2011 at 7:52 am
I've never used scaffolding and I'm not sure what to suggest. If it was my application, I would use a view to retrieve the aditional column and expose the view...
October 24, 2011 at 6:03 am
Konstantin Konstantinov (10/23/2011)
October 24, 2011 at 2:00 am
Viewing 15 posts - 2,416 through 2,430 (of 5,394 total)