Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 118 total)
On any select statement output i want to eliminate the header line as below
"---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "
June 6, 2006 at 9:47 am
Try
KILL {spid} [WITH STATUSONLY]
Statusonly : displays the current progress report.
Also on SP_Who2 output check the staus of the SPID. If it is "Killed/ Rollback" you have restart the SQLServices.
June 5, 2006 at 3:04 am
Depending on what would like to monitor.
Try also BMC Patrol, IBM Unicenter. MOM.
June 5, 2006 at 2:10 am
Got weird !
The problem occures iintermittently for the last two days. Now the problem got resolved by itself. I have not made any changes.
I'm sure it would be of network...
June 5, 2006 at 2:02 am
Jayakumar,
It could be an indication that the primary_server_name column of log_shipping_primaries or the secondary_server_name column of log_shipping_secondaries does not reflect the proper names.
June 5, 2006 at 1:54 am
Ram,
Refered the links
http://www.dbforums.com/archive/index.php/t-929535.html
http://www.mcse.ms/archive81-2005-3-1512945.html
It does not answer the problem.
John,
That is simple 'select statement againt a table', not even where clause being used. The table has arround 40000 records.
HTH
June 1, 2006 at 2:13 am
It is does not seem to be localized and network related issue. As I tried on different machinces running the queries. Even the application getting "Time out errors" because of...
May 31, 2006 at 6:53 pm
It has external fragmentation. It requirs DBCC REINDEX to rebuild index.
DBCC INDEXDEFRAG will be useful if it is internal fragmentation that too if it less.
May 9, 2006 at 9:39 am
My box running on the latest SP and Hotfix, but facing the same problem.
May 6, 2006 at 4:27 am
I am facing the similar proble on SQL Server 200 running with SP4 and AWE hotfix applied box.
Process 243:0 (13d0) UMS Context 0x08F8FA18 appears to be non-yielding on Scheduler 3. ...
May 6, 2006 at 3:55 am
Hi David,
Thanks for the reply.
So you mean to say that I have 6 Instances on both nodes, I need to apply one by one on each instaces. It is just...
April 25, 2006 at 8:53 pm
Is that no.of tranactions?
Would be around 1000 transaction per hour.
March 30, 2006 at 8:15 am
Hi,
I too, facing this similar problem. But googled have not found any explanation or solution.
~ Sivaprasad S
March 29, 2006 at 7:31 am
Can you just elobrate what are things do I need set with SQL Profiler to capture the transactions which could cause the log file growth.?
January 31, 2006 at 11:10 pm
'Reovery interval ' option has not changed , it is set with default value of 0 (Zero).
January 31, 2006 at 10:59 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 118 total)