Viewing 15 posts - 4,246 through 4,260 (of 4,820 total)
And here we have a near perfect example of why those kinds of designs are really bad ideas. No offense to anyone, but coding what this poster wants...
July 22, 2009 at 9:22 am
Thansk for the update and feedback.
Steve
(aka smunson)
:-):-):-)
July 22, 2009 at 6:55 am
I guess I forgot to tell you how to do that. There's only one really good way to this that you could easily rely on. Group...
July 21, 2009 at 2:42 pm
You're correct that the sorting on Category group is sorting left to right. Your last image file shows categories within Co. #1 in numeric order, and what you...
July 21, 2009 at 2:26 pm
The problem with COALESCE is that you can only retrieve one value per row, and if I recall one of the OP's posts correctly, you might well need values from...
July 21, 2009 at 1:56 pm
Unless you have the 'hello world' text on the end of at least some of the data in the DataIntegrityErrors table, you'll never have a match to worry about avoiding,...
July 20, 2009 at 7:00 pm
I hear you on the "won't fly" deal, but if you stop and think about it, that rather strongly suggests that there's a huge disconnect between the process being used...
July 20, 2009 at 10:34 am
The problem these companies are trying to avoid is having to support their own product in an environment they can't control. It can be difficult, and they can...
July 17, 2009 at 11:38 am
One way you can ferret out a potential conversion error is to use a derived table where you eliminate any non-numeric values for your result_value field.
DECLARE @test-2 TABLE(
result_value varchar(20)
)
INSERT INTO...
July 16, 2009 at 12:42 pm
No offense, but using the option in Access as a means of avoiding having to write the query to produce correct results is a horribly lazy way of getting something...
July 16, 2009 at 11:56 am
I'm just wondering why generate XML, when you could just do a classic ASP webpage with ADO code in VBScript to retrieve the data records and dynamically generate the HTML...
July 15, 2009 at 5:46 am
I hear you on the newbee-isms. I was at that point a lot of years ago. First point is that you can't wait until AFTER...
July 10, 2009 at 6:15 am
You'll have to decide EXACTLY what you mean by "exact match", and you need to be as anal about that as is possible. You either need to know...
July 8, 2009 at 4:12 pm
If this process is the only way that new records should be inserted into the destination table, then you could use a trigger on the INSERT that would update the...
July 8, 2009 at 4:02 pm
Ooops! triple post...
July 8, 2009 at 3:46 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 4,246 through 4,260 (of 4,820 total)