Viewing 15 posts - 3,856 through 3,870 (of 6,036 total)
Not the best approach I've ever seen.
Actually, one of the worst.
Why not just include the check into the trigger itself?
Create Trigger .. blah-blah-blah
AS
BEGIN
IF dbo.IsOwner(suser_sname()) = 0
RETURN
[Trigger body]
END
Of course, users must...
June 28, 2007 at 4:13 pm
Can you give an example of my rude tone asking you for something?
> If you are so concerned about 2000 forum why are you talking about database mirroring ?
It's you...
June 28, 2007 at 3:24 pm
Sorry, it's SQL Server 2000 forum.
Pay more attention to your words.
You post your suggestions to SQL 2000 users, and they don't work for them.
And what's so wrong about askung for...
June 28, 2007 at 3:07 pm
Right, David, business requirement.
Let's see.
You get the amounts to pay from where?
Weight*price.
Right?
Price is written on the wall, but where do you get weight?
From digital weights.
Right?
Now, how those digital weights...
June 28, 2007 at 2:58 pm
Cath,
as soon as you started off-topic, out of curiosity - what are those interesting things you have learnt about mathematics from this thread?
June 28, 2007 at 6:22 am
David, so boring!
I said money, not int.
I said decimal(12,6), not int.
Go to programming courses and learn how to declare variables and assing values to it.
June 28, 2007 at 4:14 am
You are boring, David.
Show everyone how implied zeros can make it true:
1/3(money + implied zeros) - 1/3(decimal(12,6) + implied zeros) = 0.00 (whatever datatype + implied zeros)
(Do it on...
June 28, 2007 at 2:54 am
> Because it's a boring game.
Yeah, you're right.
It becomes really boring.
Guys are so low, they don't even understand the level of stupidity they expose.
Mathematical abstraction is something...
June 27, 2007 at 11:43 pm
1. You typed "Round(.1250,3)"
But the whole thing was about rounding to 2 decimal numbers.
That's where TR and BR return different results.
So, keep to the topic.
You typed there "> .12500"
It's...
June 27, 2007 at 11:11 pm
"That's all you need to do."
Was it you or somebody else?
You're making really funny noises, David.
![]()
June 27, 2007 at 10:06 pm
"Again, prove that TR sees the precise number 0.3333 as all values between 0.3333(0) and 0.3333(9). That's all you need to do. "
Is it your words?
So, don't skip around.
June 27, 2007 at 9:41 pm
Let's finish with one question before we move to next ones.
June 27, 2007 at 9:37 pm
So, no proof to back up your absurd claims?
June 27, 2007 at 9:36 pm
No, TR takes 0.1250 as = 0.1250.
Can you provide any proof for this?
-----------
There is no such value as 0.1250.
0.1250 is a limited precision decimal representation of some...
June 27, 2007 at 8:46 pm
Are you sure TR takes 0.1250 as < 0.1250(0)
Any proof for this?
June 27, 2007 at 7:48 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 3,856 through 3,870 (of 6,036 total)