Viewing 15 posts - 2,161 through 2,175 (of 6,036 total)
SQL Kiwi (9/7/2012)
Try this:
....
I don't think it proves anything.
Logical/physical reads/writes are about pages read/written.
There was never an argument that SQL Server finds pages affected by the UPDATE not changed and...
September 9, 2012 at 5:40 pm
SQL Kiwi (9/7/2012)
September 7, 2012 at 1:23 am
MissTippsInOz (9/7/2012)
You have had numerous genuine responses from people who are trying to help you to understand the behaviour of a 'non-updating update'. You have been given code (and...
September 7, 2012 at 1:17 am
SQL Kiwi (9/7/2012)
A modification counter used by statistics update is increased, yes. Rolled-back changes, and changes that don't change anything all count.
Key word - changes.
No matter if it's rolled...
September 7, 2012 at 12:49 am
SQL Kiwi (9/7/2012)
If you don't stop being snarky in your replies
You may notice I just quoted you. Word to word.
And that is exactly the problem. My question to...
September 7, 2012 at 12:36 am
SQL Kiwi (9/6/2012)
Statistics updates are triggered when a modification threshold is exceeded. The modification counters count logical changes - even rolled back changes count.
So, there are modifications?
SQL...
September 7, 2012 at 12:04 am
SQL Kiwi (9/6/2012)
The logical update operation.
What exactly is logical update operation and what other kind of update operatios are there?
If you don't stop being snarky in your replies
You may...
September 6, 2012 at 11:56 pm
Sergiy (9/6/2012)
SQL Kiwi (9/6/2012)
September 6, 2012 at 11:49 pm
SQL Kiwi (9/6/2012)
Sergiy (9/6/2012)
Used for data-modification operations, such as INSERT, UPDATE, or DELETE. Ensures that multiple updates cannot be made to the same resource at the same time.
I thought you...
September 6, 2012 at 11:46 pm
SQL Kiwi (9/6/2012)
September 6, 2012 at 11:35 pm
I've come accross a very ineresting thing.
I was trying to test for some other case, but the original test geve me some different result.
I was running this:
BEGIN TRANSACTION
UPDATE dbo.test
SET...
September 6, 2012 at 11:28 pm
SQL Kiwi (9/6/2012)
Sergiy (9/6/2012)
SQL Kiwi (9/6/2012)
Taking a shared lock would not give the same behaviour as taking an exclusive lock.Can you bring sopme details please?
The two lock types are different,...
September 6, 2012 at 11:08 pm
SQL Kiwi (9/6/2012)
What do you mean by this?
By updating you're losing data.
You might think you don't need it anymore, but still - you're losing data previosly recorded in the database.
Which...
September 6, 2012 at 11:03 pm
SQL Kiwi (9/6/2012)
Taking a shared lock would not give the same behaviour as taking an exclusive lock.
Can you bring sopme details please?
September 6, 2012 at 11:00 pm
Eugene Elutin (8/29/2012)
I would probably agree on that with one small addition: such verification should be made in a client app not in the update statement itself, otherwise you may...
September 6, 2012 at 9:22 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 2,161 through 2,175 (of 6,036 total)