Viewing 15 posts - 1,336 through 1,350 (of 2,840 total)
One question for you... Dont you want to keep the records for historical purpose?
February 8, 2010 at 12:32 pm
Steve Cullen (2/8/2010)
It might be faster to collect the last 7 days worth of data into a new table, drop the original, then rename the new table.
You were quicker on...
February 8, 2010 at 12:09 pm
There are couple of Options for you that comes to my mind.
1. Look at Table Partitioning
2. Instead of deleting from table, insert into another table with the last 7 days...
February 8, 2010 at 12:09 pm
If the connection is being refused at the database level you will see the error details in the error log of the DB.
Also check Select @@servername and see if...
February 8, 2010 at 9:04 am
Do you see anything in your error log?
February 8, 2010 at 8:43 am
Are your tables normalized? I am just wondering why you would have single table with 25 gig of data for just one year.
I think your best option is to go...
February 5, 2010 at 11:24 am
In SQL 2008 the TempDB usuage is very high compared to SQL 2000. If your disks are not configured properly you might find some IO bottlenecks. Couple of other thing...
February 5, 2010 at 8:16 am
The DB server, is it hosting only the Database or does it have other applications as well? You could probably be experiencing IO bottleneck. Not sure though...
February 5, 2010 at 6:51 am
Hi David,
It depends on your queries. Let us say you always query from a table in specific order for example desc, then at the time of execution, the sort operation...
February 5, 2010 at 4:58 am
Have you looked up on Indexed views? here is a bit that might interest you about indexed views. (taken from MSDN)
* Aggregations can be precomputed and...
February 4, 2010 at 12:44 pm
Are the servers in the same domain?
Also if you do a nslookup Servername from command prompt what do you get?
Can you ping or telnet to the servers with...
February 4, 2010 at 12:19 pm
Warehousing is probably where you have to go to. Does the data change for Old records? If not why not have a pre populated summary table? You can have a...
February 4, 2010 at 11:44 am
Did you by any chance look at the execution plan? There are lots of reasons why the performance could differ between your test and production.
Do you take care of...
February 4, 2010 at 11:41 am
David Lester (2/4/2010)
February 4, 2010 at 11:18 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1,336 through 1,350 (of 2,840 total)