Viewing 15 posts - 2,536 through 2,550 (of 2,840 total)
GilaMonster (1/15/2009)
Without that, I can give you generic advice - make sure all your queries are written a optimally...
-Roy
January 19, 2009 at 6:39 am
You can take a look at Maxdop to limit the number of CPUs used for the Jobs.
Are you saying that the Developers access your production DB where your clients...
-Roy
January 16, 2009 at 12:44 pm
Instead of sys.objects, why not try
SELECT *
FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.ROUTINES
...
-Roy
January 16, 2009 at 11:23 am
The naming convention of SQL Server is a four part name.
Try this naming convention
You should not have DBO in that name
-Roy
January 16, 2009 at 11:05 am
Check the event viewer to see if it is throwing an error. Also try to see what the Error log shows.
-Roy
January 16, 2009 at 9:53 am
You can use this script to generate Grant permission for each procedure to the application user.
SELECT 'GRANT EXECUTE ON [dbo].['+ ROUTINE_NAME + '] to ApllicationUser'
...
-Roy
January 16, 2009 at 9:44 am
To see more details about Indexable view please check this link.
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/impprfiv.mspx
-Roy
January 15, 2009 at 12:58 pm
You can look at Marathon clustering. Seems very efficient. But not sure of the performance. Set up is not easy. You get both Hardware and Software redundancy. Also it does...
-Roy
January 15, 2009 at 8:01 am
I assume that your Data center has Generator that will kick in Automatically. Keeping the Servers in two physical location reduces your options.
Keep in mind that Clustering means both...
-Roy
January 15, 2009 at 7:22 am
Did you try doing a derived table?
Something like this.
Select idt1,nme1,nmeP,varC, var_CD,nme_O from
(SELECT DISTINCT
M.idt1, M.nme1, M.nmeP,
R.varC, R.var_CD, O.nme_O, M.idt_P
FROM
fact_M M INNER JOIN
dim_R R ON M.sur_id_M = R.sur_id_M INNER...
-Roy
January 15, 2009 at 7:11 am
Instead of editing the Index, Did you try updating the Stats of that table? Maybe the Statistics is outdated and that is why the query engine is taking a plan...
-Roy
January 15, 2009 at 6:57 am
Because depending on the type of trigger if it fails it could roll back the transaction. Also you are making one more step to a normal transaction. (ie an Insert...
-Roy
January 14, 2009 at 8:51 am
Writing a trigger would be the best way to go. Since triggers do not have that much over head in 2005 like it had in 2000, triggers shouldnt be an...
-Roy
January 13, 2009 at 7:40 pm
You could always use Dynamic SQL to do these kind of things. But be very very careful when using Dynamic SQL since this is one of the best way to...
-Roy
January 13, 2009 at 7:55 am
Thanks Jack for completing my answer. I have to work on my answering skills. I always give the answer in a general form. Not specific to the question.
-Roy
January 9, 2009 at 10:47 am
Viewing 15 posts - 2,536 through 2,550 (of 2,840 total)