Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 205 total)
Quick question is it only me or has the formatting of that article gone a bit haywire. I'm sure there shouldn't be HTML formatting tags appearing alongside the SQL example.
I...
June 1, 2009 at 1:26 am
I remember some years reading an article similar to this about how to replace CURSORS with WHILE loops and the huge
debate about how much better it was for performance due...
December 24, 2008 at 6:28 am
Ok thanks I will just keep the UNIQUE non clustered index then as that can also be used in FK relationships.
December 9, 2008 at 5:57 am
I am thinking that its just not possible to add INCLUDE columns into the non-clustered index created for the PK and would have to either just use a UNIQUE constraint...
December 9, 2008 at 4:11 am
In answer to Charles request to see a script that puts all this info into use with a script that runs on a timed basis that creates a list of...
September 17, 2008 at 3:54 am
Has no-one had to move a system from 32 to 64 bit? System is windows 2003, IIS 6, ASP, SQL 20005
Just an update on some more problems I have found...
July 25, 2008 at 4:37 am
I think it must be something to do with a setting/pack or local installation setting as on my laptop at home when connecting over the VPN in management studio to...
July 22, 2008 at 3:31 am
Whats a passthrough view? Like a materialised view created on a timed job maybe?
I haven't done much work with views and I definitley don't need the data to be re-calculated...
May 23, 2008 at 8:20 am
From what I read in this article http://www.developer.com/db/article.php/3613301
there is no ALTER SYNONYM statement.
May 22, 2008 at 6:03 am
I hadn't heard about SYNONYMs and have just read an article about them.
So I would still have my two tables MATRIX_A and MATRIX_B but my SELECT statements that reference
them would...
May 21, 2008 at 1:28 am
65 milliseconds doesn't sound too long to wait.
I'm running this in SQL 2005 by the way.
May 20, 2008 at 8:17 am
Ok cheers but why would you do it this way. What would be the issue with sp_rename? Would it take too long to rename or just cause my site errors...
May 20, 2008 at 8:09 am
Very interesting information. I didn't know most of that and it explains a lot. Basically I am worrying
about nothing in the majority of these cases then.
Thanks for your input!
February 26, 2008 at 2:30 am
I don't think so as the output of the CTE is an adjaceny table where the process causing the block
has a blockingSPID = 0. Then all the processes affected by...
February 15, 2008 at 4:59 am
Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 205 total)