Viewing 15 posts - 13,111 through 13,125 (of 13,841 total)
Are you using Access to delete the data?
If you are using linked tables within Access, you must ensure that Access knows the primary key of the table when you link...
March 28, 2006 at 3:24 am
OK - this is turning into a weird one. If you take the
and PickupDate > '3/2/2006' --*****
line out of the query, what is the latest entry displayed?
You could also...
March 27, 2006 at 10:10 am
What is the datatype of the PickupDate field - is it datetime or varchar()?
March 27, 2006 at 9:57 am
Expanding on PW's post, I suggest you use this format:
'YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS.mmm'
So your query becomes:
...
and PickupDate > '2006-02-03 00:00:00.000'
order by PickupDate
(if you're using English date format.)
March 27, 2006 at 9:48 am
A strange request!
update table set age = 32 where id = [PK for row containing John's data]
update table set age = 26 where id = [PK for row...
March 27, 2006 at 9:38 am
Please do not cross post. Follow this thread.
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/forums/shwmessage.aspx?forumid=23&messageid=268690
March 27, 2006 at 9:21 am
Are you exporting the field as text?
March 27, 2006 at 9:20 am
So what's wrong with my solution? ![]()
Your solution, I'm afraid, is logically flawed. Eg if this is sample data
T1 (CustNo, OrderNo)
1,1
1,2
2,1
T2 (CustNo, OrderNo)
1,1
Your query...
March 27, 2006 at 5:50 am
So are you thinking of adding a new column to the 'old' table corresponding with 'software_no' in the new table?
March 27, 2006 at 3:07 am
Once you have the 'next' identity number, what are you going to do with it?
Maybe @@IDENTITY, or Scope_Identity() (check BOL for details) will give you what you need?
March 27, 2006 at 2:58 am
Your idea is probably the way I would do it.
The tricky bit is the creation of the mapping table. Perhaps you can partially automate this, by matching on 'test description'...
March 27, 2006 at 2:53 am
select t1.*
from t1 left join t2 on t1.Custno = t2.CustNo and t1.OrderNo = t2.OrderNo
where t2.CustNo is null and t2.OrderNo is null
March 26, 2006 at 9:35 am
Why do you want to return every single field, in every single record, for such a large table?
A clustered index will help if you run a query with a suitable...
March 25, 2006 at 5:43 am
Yes it matters (see next para). The triggers will fire as usual, because they are defined at table level. So you need to avoid importing into those tables that will...
March 22, 2006 at 6:04 am
Maybe you could create a trigger that would perform the integrity checks that you need on insert, update etc.
March 21, 2006 at 10:05 am
Viewing 15 posts - 13,111 through 13,125 (of 13,841 total)