Viewing 8 posts - 181 through 189 (of 189 total)
If you are determined to use dynamic T-SQL then use a parameterised sp_executesql statement.
Even better I'd turn this into a parameterised stored procedure and do the string splitting on the...
May 19, 2011 at 2:43 am
Using dynamic SQL like this is equal to the last S in KISS - Stupid!
SQL Injection attack waiting to happen.
May 19, 2011 at 1:32 am
-- removed --
whoops didn't see there were more pages before replying.
May 3, 2011 at 1:31 am
I guess the whole check what version of .NET you have installed via your browser is supposed to be quick?
Why not simply go Control Panel >> Programs and Features to...
May 3, 2011 at 1:09 am
I've installed both SQL 2008 and SQL 2008 R2 (both 64bit versions) on Windows 7 Pro 64bit and had zero installation issues.
I must be lucky.
May 3, 2011 at 1:06 am
Why use the output syntax, table variable and dynamic sql?
Wouldn't the following be simpler (no permissions issue on table if user running it only has access to SP either) :
insert...
February 24, 2011 at 3:32 am
I ran the same 2 tests on Win 7 64bit Quad core, 8GB Ram machine running SQL Server 2008 Developer 64bit.
And got the following:
GetDate(): 2604 values with precision...
May 12, 2010 at 1:29 am
I haven't looked at it yet mainly because on the product I work on we're only just getting onto SQL 2005 with the version currently in development. Even then it's...
September 2, 2009 at 6:29 am
Viewing 8 posts - 181 through 189 (of 189 total)