Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 376 through 390 (of 458 total)

  • RE: How do you admin your databases?

    Almost exclusively RDP, since I have to perform other tasks on the servers as well. I'm the only developer / DBA / operator in the entire shop. The machine is...

  • RE: Verify your backups - NOW!

    GilaMonster (9/21/2012)


    Not talking about the backup process itself.

    You know that the backup completed successfully. Not the same as knowing that the backup file is good.

    I guess I see. Of course,...

  • RE: Verify your backups - NOW!

    Lynn Pettis (9/21/2012)


    A hardware or IO failure. Disk sectors can go bad on you.

    Well, yes, but that can happen even after you've created and test-restored a backup. I plan...

  • RE: Verify your backups - NOW!

    Okay, that makes sense. But then I don't understand what can be wrong with the backup. If I run checkDB, I know my database is good. If I back up...

  • RE: Verify your backups - NOW!

    Well, then why does Grant (and others) make a point of saying you should test-restore the backup? If the checksum is enough to guarantee that the backup was done correctly,...

  • RE: Verify your backups - NOW!

    I realize I'm getting pretty far out there with all this, but...

    If the backup with checksum can look okay, but still be corrupt, couldn't restoring that failed backup also look...

  • RE: Document First, Code Later

    gwardell (9/9/2012)


    I worked once on a government contract where the entire application was fleshed out in a design tool. That "application" wound up being the deliverable and the application...

  • RE: Document First, Code Later

    gwardell (9/8/2012)


    I was on a project once where I told NOT to document something because he/they would never read it.

    Later I was criticized because nobody understood my code.

    Duh?

    The two are...

  • RE: Document First, Code Later

    Sounds nicely politically correct, however, what do you do when the users themselves don't know quite what they want? I run into this a lot - they have a vague...

  • RE: "Per-user" temp table

    jerry-621596 (8/9/2012)


    If you are using Acess for the application side, why don't you pull the original dataset into Access and work to refine that instead of trying to track a...

  • RE: "Per-user" temp table

    SomewhereSomehow (8/9/2012)


    ... or it will be always a scan. ...

    Yes, it will almost always be a scan in these cases - that's the problem. I'm handling the edge cases...

  • RE: "Per-user" temp table

    Lowell (8/9/2012)


    what about going ahead and using either a permenant or a global temp table, but adding an extra column with some identifier to the user or session, ie the...

  • RE: "Per-user" temp table

    SomewhereSomehow (8/9/2012)


    Now I understand what are you trying to do, and my idea with temp table (even it is technically possible, and even if you'll find the way to issue...

  • RE: "Per-user" temp table

    Gazareth (8/9/2012)


    You'd need some way in Access to execute T-SQL (or equivalent) rather than calling a proc.

    I don't use Access so I've no idea if it has that ability, sorry.

    e.g....

  • RE: "Per-user" temp table

    Gazareth (8/9/2012)


    No, if you create a local temp table outside a proc, it isn't destroyed until the creating session disconnects (as it doesn't go out of scope).

    So this table could...

Viewing 15 posts - 376 through 390 (of 458 total)