Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 458 total)
Can't think of anything to add to this one, just congratulations. Pulling off a stunt like that has got to be a pretty major ego boost.
March 13, 2013 at 5:42 pm
Thanks, Erin, that does indeed produce exactly what I need (except for the trailing separator, of course). I've been experimenting with both the self-join and FOR XML stuff today, and...
March 12, 2013 at 6:15 am
Yes, Erin, that's the kind of thing I'm looking for. I've used the for xml path('')
syntax before, but I don't really understand what it's doing very well. I just...
March 11, 2013 at 4:40 pm
Sean Lange (3/11/2013)
March 11, 2013 at 3:32 pm
It's not obsolete if it still does the job it was designed to do. I've written my share of FORTRAN, RPG, COBOL and who knows what else over the years....
February 22, 2013 at 2:48 pm
Bill Wehnert - The Tom Swift books (I had a set, too) weren't written by Asimov. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Swift
I've been a gadget-geek all my life, since I was a little kid, dismantling...
February 22, 2013 at 9:53 am
Argh, never mind. Your comment about schemas bumped me in the right direction.
<shame-faced confession>
I was calling the correct procedure name, but from the wrong schema.
</shame-faced confession>
Thirty lashes with a wet...
January 30, 2013 at 9:22 am
Lynn Pettis (12/21/2012)
December 23, 2012 at 2:13 pm
Eugene Elutin (12/21/2012)
What does make you to say "I don't see that as being especially effective"?
I meant putting all DIFFERENT TYPES of values together into a single string. As you...
December 21, 2012 at 8:12 am
Eugene Elutin (12/21/2012)
December 21, 2012 at 7:15 am
Lynn Pettis (12/21/2012)
Eugene Elutin (12/21/2012)
December 21, 2012 at 7:06 am
GilaMonster (12/21/2012)
pdanes (12/21/2012)
That is method 1, suggested by Grant, Jared and (I thought) you. No? If not, what did you mean?
Neither Grant, Jared or myself suggested a 'normal' table. We...
December 21, 2012 at 7:03 am
Lynn Pettis (12/21/2012)
pdanes (12/21/2012)
GilaMonster (12/21/2012)
Neither of those is what was suggested.A parameter table that contains that list split into rows.
That what I said, I think. This string:
'1E,D,E,Es,F,Fs,G,Gs,H,Hs,J,K,Ks,L,Ls,Lc,M,Me,N,Ns,O,Os,Ob,Oc,P,Ps,Pa,Pb,Pc,R,Ra,S,Ss,Sb,Sc,T,Ts,Ta,Tb,Tc,Ua,Ub,Uc,Va,Z,Zs'
Would instead get passed...
December 21, 2012 at 6:55 am
GilaMonster (12/21/2012)
Neither of those is what was suggested.A parameter table that contains that list split into rows.
That what I said, I think. This string:
'1E,D,E,Es,F,Fs,G,Gs,H,Hs,J,K,Ks,L,Ls,Lc,M,Me,N,Ns,O,Os,Ob,Oc,P,Ps,Pa,Pb,Pc,R,Ra,S,Ss,Sb,Sc,T,Ts,Ta,Tb,Tc,Ua,Ub,Uc,Va,Z,Zs'
Would instead get passed as a table:
KatalogLetter...
December 21, 2012 at 6:06 am
GilaMonster (12/20/2012)
pdanes (12/19/2012)
GilaMonster (12/19/2012)
pdanes (12/19/2012)
December 21, 2012 at 5:01 am
Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 458 total)