Viewing 15 posts - 8,191 through 8,205 (of 8,416 total)
Dang but Adam posts fast!
Here's the link to his blog entry that I was going to post:
Jeff is going to love this 😉
Cheers,
Paul
April 27, 2009 at 7:39 am
@Phil, Flo:
Probably the easiest way would be to compare your respective .sqlplan actual execution plans for the queries in question, together with the usual CPU and IO information...?
Don't get me...
April 27, 2009 at 5:53 am
Posting your question about SQL Server 2000 in the 2005 section wasn't the brightest start possible here!
Nevertheless, this is a great place to look for recursive/hierarchical techniques on SQL Server...
April 27, 2009 at 3:51 am
marshall.jones (4/27/2009)
Let me scare you a little Paul and tell you that Vanders helped me out already. Good to see a TM guy dishing out advice tho 😛
Matt helping someone?...
April 27, 2009 at 3:38 am
Hey,
It would have helped a great deal had you posted example code.
WITH RECOMPILE at the top of a procedure does not extend to any dynamic SQL run by that procedure.
Adding...
April 27, 2009 at 3:09 am
Hey Benn,
Windows 2003 Small Business Edition can use up to a maximum of 4GB RAM - see http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa366778.aspx#physical_memory_limits_windows_server_2003
SQL Server Enterprise with 12GB RAM would need Windows 2003 Enterprise or above.
If...
April 27, 2009 at 3:01 am
Hey Mohit,
Sounds like you're doing all you can. My only other thoughts would be to:
1. Ensure that SQL Server has sufficient memory installed so that the data stays...
April 27, 2009 at 2:50 am
This wasn't really a CLR Integration and Programming question, was it?
😉
April 27, 2009 at 2:03 am
Hey Ian,
Just a quick question before I post a proper reply: how many 'bits' are likely to be set per user?
The relational solution will be much quicker and more maintainable,...
April 27, 2009 at 1:54 am
John,
Register the library as an assembly in SQL Server using CREATE ASSEMBLY.
Open the Object Browser in Visual Studio and add or locate the library in there.
Click the button on the...
April 27, 2009 at 1:37 am
Andrew,
There too much there to respond to line-by-line, so I would just say:
I have worked in two large international companies now that experimented with ESX virtualization. Neither were conspicuous...
April 26, 2009 at 8:57 pm
Bob Hovious (4/26/2009)
April 26, 2009 at 3:03 pm
Florian Reischl (4/26/2009)
Paul White (4/25/2009)
- no point in re-inventing the wheel, eh? 😉
One of the hobbies of my chief. We have an own string, DateTime, List, DB-Connection, even an own...
April 26, 2009 at 5:31 am
A quick post before bed concerning the TVFs posted by Phil.
Unless I am missing something obvious, this solution is heavily dependent on the TVF only being called once.
This is achieved...
April 26, 2009 at 5:29 am
andrew.hatfield (4/26/2009)
It depends on the workload of the environment, it's CPU and Memory footprint as...
April 26, 2009 at 1:41 am
Viewing 15 posts - 8,191 through 8,205 (of 8,416 total)