Viewing 15 posts - 7,726 through 7,740 (of 8,415 total)
You have an indication that at some points in time, your disk sub-system is unable to keep up with I/O requests from SQL Server. Whether this is a severe...
June 19, 2009 at 10:18 pm
jason (6/19/2009)
ALTER DATABASE @dbname SET READ_COMMITTED_SNAPSHOT ON;
After i set these 2 option, do i still need to use SET Transaction Isolation Level Snapshot on each...
June 19, 2009 at 10:08 pm
jason (6/19/2009)
Will this be an issue when using Read_Committed_Snapshot ?
It depends. The row-versioning isolation levels do come with a cost, the question is whether the improvement in concurrency outweighs...
June 19, 2009 at 10:03 pm
John Rowan (6/19/2009)
June 19, 2009 at 9:32 pm
Just taken a quick look at the estimated plan - would it be possible to try running:
select * from dbo.iv_SystemTransactionCardFund (option hash join)
to see if that reduces the CXPACKET waits?
edit:...
June 19, 2009 at 8:40 pm
John Rowan (6/19/2009)
I would question their use even when implemented correctly.
Heh. Well unless you are $deity posting under a psedonym, I think we're going to need more than just...
June 19, 2009 at 10:28 am
It's a shame that DBCC CLEANTABLE only operates on variable-length columns, but I guess it makes sense, given the row layout.
Books Online is very brief concerning all this. After...
June 19, 2009 at 9:30 am
June 19, 2009 at 8:56 am
Grant Fritchey (6/19/2009)
mazzz (6/19/2009)
Has SSC ever had a thread like this?That is a weird one isn't it? It doesn't look like Phil helped matters much.
Phil's posts were just placeholders. ...
June 19, 2009 at 8:54 am
Jamie,
Good post.
However, the first post did say that 'kladibeeto' knew about full scan and percentages - the question was specifically about the default sampling rate...
I say 'good post'...
June 19, 2009 at 8:44 am
John Rowan (6/18/2009)
June 19, 2009 at 8:40 am
Hey Jeff,
For added safety on 2K5 and 2K8 (pre-SP1) you need a MAXDOP (1) before the SCOPE_IDENTITY to avoid the bug described here: http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=328811
In the interests of fair play and...
June 19, 2009 at 8:32 am
[font="Tahoma"]Excellent post Bruce.
You are right that the parent column(s) in a foreign-key relationship must have a unique index defined (primary key constraint, unique index or constraint).
The child column(s) do not...
June 19, 2009 at 2:05 am
This is the Books Online link: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms175156(SQL.90).aspx
This is an article on this site: http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/T-SQL/63115/
The APPLY solution should generally slightly out-perform the CTE (although the plans are pretty similar).
The main difference...
June 18, 2009 at 3:48 am
Hey Bruce,
if Col3 is not X, then don't bother filtering
That assumes that the condition on Col3 is evaluated first and that the condition on Col2 shouldn't be evaluated if the...
June 18, 2009 at 3:39 am
Viewing 15 posts - 7,726 through 7,740 (of 8,415 total)