Viewing 15 posts - 7,726 through 7,740 (of 8,416 total)
Most of your questions can be answered from this TechNet best practices article.
June 19, 2009 at 10:24 pm
You have an indication that at some points in time, your disk sub-system is unable to keep up with I/O requests from SQL Server. Whether this is a severe...
June 19, 2009 at 10:18 pm
jason (6/19/2009)
ALTER DATABASE @dbname SET READ_COMMITTED_SNAPSHOT ON;
After i set these 2 option, do i still need to use SET Transaction Isolation Level Snapshot on each...
June 19, 2009 at 10:08 pm
jason (6/19/2009)
Will this be an issue when using Read_Committed_Snapshot ?
It depends. The row-versioning isolation levels do come with a cost, the question is whether the improvement in concurrency outweighs...
June 19, 2009 at 10:03 pm
John Rowan (6/19/2009)
June 19, 2009 at 9:32 pm
Just taken a quick look at the estimated plan - would it be possible to try running:
select * from dbo.iv_SystemTransactionCardFund (option hash join)
to see if that reduces the CXPACKET waits?
edit:...
June 19, 2009 at 8:40 pm
John Rowan (6/19/2009)
I would question their use even when implemented correctly.
Heh. Well unless you are $deity posting under a psedonym, I think we're going to need more than just...
June 19, 2009 at 10:28 am
It's a shame that DBCC CLEANTABLE only operates on variable-length columns, but I guess it makes sense, given the row layout.
Books Online is very brief concerning all this. After...
June 19, 2009 at 9:30 am
Kit G (6/19/2009)
Kermit the Frog?
Win.
June 19, 2009 at 8:56 am
Grant Fritchey (6/19/2009)
mazzz (6/19/2009)
Has SSC ever had a thread like this?That is a weird one isn't it? It doesn't look like Phil helped matters much.
Phil's posts were just placeholders. ...
June 19, 2009 at 8:54 am
Jamie,
Good post.
However, the first post did say that 'kladibeeto' knew about full scan and percentages - the question was specifically about the default sampling rate...
I say 'good post'...
June 19, 2009 at 8:44 am
John Rowan (6/18/2009)
June 19, 2009 at 8:40 am
Hey Jeff,
For added safety on 2K5 and 2K8 (pre-SP1) you need a MAXDOP (1) before the SCOPE_IDENTITY to avoid the bug described here: http://connect.microsoft.com/SQL/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=328811
In the interests of fair play and...
June 19, 2009 at 8:32 am
[font="Tahoma"]Excellent post Bruce.
You are right that the parent column(s) in a foreign-key relationship must have a unique index defined (primary key constraint, unique index or constraint).
The child column(s) do not...
June 19, 2009 at 2:05 am
This is the Books Online link: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms175156(SQL.90).aspx
This is an article on this site: http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/T-SQL/63115/
The APPLY solution should generally slightly out-perform the CTE (although the plans are pretty similar).
The main difference...
June 18, 2009 at 3:48 am
Viewing 15 posts - 7,726 through 7,740 (of 8,416 total)