Viewing 15 posts - 6,316 through 6,330 (of 8,416 total)
pbarbin (1/27/2010)
January 27, 2010 at 8:07 pm
Cool stuff Steve - thanks for taking the time to write such a comprehensive answer - makes sense 🙂
January 26, 2010 at 11:12 pm
Jeff Moden (1/26/2010)
Considering the DROP statement, I hope the OP doesn't decide to skip the USE TEMPDB statement. 😛
Quite. I added the USE tempdb; statement just before posting actually...
January 26, 2010 at 11:10 pm
CirquedeSQLeil (1/26/2010)
Good article. I couldn't add anything more than what Paul has already indicated. Maybe a follow-up article on the same subject to go along with that QOD?;-)
Good...
January 26, 2010 at 10:21 pm
CirquedeSQLeil (1/26/2010)
Alas, that was before my time here at SSC.
Really? Wow. I thought it was reasonably recent - and also that you had been around for quite some...
January 26, 2010 at 10:19 pm
An interesting article on an important subject. I would have rated it 5 stars instead of 4 if it had gone further in explaining what might need to be...
January 26, 2010 at 10:06 pm
Jeffrey Williams-493691 (1/26/2010)
January 26, 2010 at 9:55 pm
Kit G (1/26/2010)
jcrawf02 (1/26/2010)
!!!???? If U R 2 $tupid 2 no tht Pl=Please then plz no help! Xprts only! :hehe:
You forgot to put in a "WTF Do0d?!" Or...
January 26, 2010 at 9:32 pm
CirquedeSQLeil (1/26/2010)
Paul White (1/26/2010)
Steve Jones - Editor (1/26/2010)
Too late to nudge, someone answered. I wish they wouldn't do that. Encourages laziness.Someone?!?! :ermm:
You encourager of laziness and evil 😀
I'm a...
January 26, 2010 at 9:31 pm
The Dixie Flatline (1/26/2010)
You're an evil man, Emperor Paulpatine.... :laugh:
Oh so The Dixie Flatline *is* Bob! I missed the transition somewhere...d'oh!
Thanks for the high compliment!
January 26, 2010 at 9:30 pm
john.arnott (1/26/2010)
January 26, 2010 at 9:28 pm
Steve Jones - Editor (1/26/2010)
Too late to nudge, someone answered. I wish they wouldn't do that. Encourages laziness.
Someone?!?! :ermm:
January 26, 2010 at 9:25 pm
@viacoboni: a construction using COALESCE is normally used, but in any case I can see no reason to prefer any variation of the method over the FOR XML solution (documented,...
January 26, 2010 at 9:20 pm
john.arnott (1/26/2010)
January 26, 2010 at 9:02 pm
BrainDonor (1/26/2010)
Paul White (1/26/2010)
Wait until his teacher sees that one!
Indeed 😉
Heh heh heh.
edit: *!@% tags!
January 26, 2010 at 4:05 am
Viewing 15 posts - 6,316 through 6,330 (of 8,416 total)