Viewing 15 posts - 6,121 through 6,135 (of 8,415 total)
Thanks John - I should have acknowledged Wesley's contribution in my previous post.
February 18, 2010 at 3:55 am
I apologise in advance if I am missing the obvious, but doesn't the definition of ##keys in the first code sample include a column called 'key_owner', whereas the second version...
February 18, 2010 at 3:53 am
Oh dear, I posted a reply to that identity-order thread before checking here :ermm:
I got the checksum question wrong by the way - fell into the 'single bit error' bear...
February 18, 2010 at 3:46 am
Gabriel P (2/18/2010)
Like say I...
February 18, 2010 at 3:44 am
Tara-1044200 (2/18/2010)
table names might be mis spelled wantedly but i just need logic. here is the structure of tables[snip]I Assume i explained it very clear.
Thanks. I have updated my...
February 18, 2010 at 3:42 am
nigel. (2/18/2010)
CirquedeSQLeil (2/17/2010)
Nice solution Paul.Indeed, very thorough. I think you've scared off the OP though 🙂
I hope not - but even if that is the case, I would hope that...
February 18, 2010 at 3:33 am
Dave Ballantyne (2/18/2010)
GT-897544 (2/17/2010)
As GSquared said, See you have an Identity column it gives the order you entered until unless you specify what order you want result set.
If I...
February 18, 2010 at 3:26 am
CirquedeSQLeil (2/17/2010)
Is that an admission to being responsible in some part?
A gate bangs open and shut in the wind...
A tumble-weed rolls by...
It is dark.
There might be grues.
February 17, 2010 at 11:32 pm
Depending how your mind works, you might find this solution more intuitive:
-- Test table
CREATE TABLE #ReconRecord
(
serial ...
February 17, 2010 at 11:28 pm
Tara-1044200 (2/17/2010)
February 17, 2010 at 10:48 pm
Alif,
I've read your question several times now, and given it some thought...but I'm afraid I can't understand what you are asking for here.
Please take another shot at explaining what you...
February 17, 2010 at 10:42 pm
Tom.Thomson (2/16/2010)
February 17, 2010 at 10:29 pm
Steve Jones - Editor (2/17/2010)
Edited. I'll clean up points in the am.
You're my favourite SSC Editor, Steve. Thanks. 😀
February 17, 2010 at 10:24 pm
Joy Smith San (2/17/2010)
I thought the below one is wrong."With an exclusive lock, no other transactions can modify data (except for operations with NOLOCK hint or read uncommitted isolation level)"
I...
February 17, 2010 at 10:23 pm
CirquedeSQLeil (2/17/2010)
Paul, the QOD does need a slight modification in verbiage.
Certainly does - and well put!
For everyone else, the answer in question is:
"With an exclusive lock, no other transactions can...
February 17, 2010 at 10:20 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 6,121 through 6,135 (of 8,415 total)