Viewing 15 posts - 5,071 through 5,085 (of 8,416 total)
Stefan_G (3/19/2010)
Nice. I started using this technique with SQL 2000 and I had not noticed that it was deprecated. Thank you for that info.
You are welcome. It comes...
March 19, 2010 at 6:39 am
SQL Dude-467553 (3/18/2010)
March 19, 2010 at 6:36 am
Have you considered using Reporting Services instead?
It is quite good at the sort of thing you seem to be doing here.
March 19, 2010 at 6:26 am
The second result set is the return code of the stored procedure, and is probably manufactured by whatever data access technology you are using to connect to SQL Server.
March 19, 2010 at 6:24 am
GilaMonster (3/19/2010)
Resurrected two year old thread.
Ha. Never noticed that! :laugh: :blink: :ermm: :blush:
March 19, 2010 at 6:18 am
Jeff Moden (3/18/2010)
BWAA-HAAA!!!! If you put everything into a single EAV, you CAN have a clustered index on all the data in the database. :hehe::-D
Database design is easy these...
March 19, 2010 at 6:16 am
The Dixie Flatline (3/19/2010)
I'm in Oxford, Mississippi, actually, about an hour south of Memphis. Memphis sits on the Mississippi River at the extreme western edge of Tennessee.
The words 'Mississippi'...
March 19, 2010 at 6:14 am
The Dixie Flatline (3/19/2010)
Hey Paul, what got you onto a recursive kick?
Blame Chris Morris 😀
Actually, that is not quite fair - I do like recursive solutions (as a challenge) but...
March 19, 2010 at 6:09 am
Complex topic. Rather than try to summarize it here, I will just link to a pretty definitive TechNet article by Eric N. Hanson and Lubor Kollar:
March 19, 2010 at 6:06 am
Stefan_G (3/18/2010)
March 19, 2010 at 6:03 am
Piotr.Rodak (3/19/2010)
March 19, 2010 at 5:47 am
fiaolle (3/19/2010)
Thanks for the help 🙂
No worries.
March 19, 2010 at 5:36 am
Tom Van Harpen (3/19/2010)
March 19, 2010 at 5:35 am
bramanthe (3/19/2010)
Paul,no. I've just shown you my solution as the answer for
Paul White NZ (3/18/2010)
Let us know how you get on.
Oh right. I see. It doesn't have...
March 19, 2010 at 5:31 am
peleg k (3/19/2010)
as i undestand, i should change the reasonRef column on Con_RecipientToMessages to an included column?
Con_RecipientToMessages is a table. You cannot make a column included on a table....
March 19, 2010 at 5:29 am
Viewing 15 posts - 5,071 through 5,085 (of 8,416 total)