Viewing 15 posts - 4,516 through 4,530 (of 8,415 total)
WayneS (3/31/2010)
In addition to what Paul suggests (using a UNION ALL), you should remove the NOLOCK hint. Unless you don't mind sending potentially wrong data back to the user. 😉
Observant...
March 31, 2010 at 12:03 pm
Trey Staker (3/31/2010)
Your links on that dear thread were very helpful. That is what I had on my study agenda today, it saved me a google...
March 31, 2010 at 12:00 pm
sknox (3/31/2010)
..."each statement being treated as its own transaction". However, Microsoft's documentation does not explicitly state this.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms175523.aspx does.
If each statement were indeed treated as its own transaction, then Hugo's query...
March 31, 2010 at 11:56 am
Lynn Pettis (3/31/2010)
Now, if they could incorporate encryption natively as well, I'd be a really happy camper
Encrypt the compressed backup you mean?
Otherwise, encyption and compression do not play nicely together...
March 31, 2010 at 11:39 am
March 31, 2010 at 11:27 am
HowardW (3/31/2010)
March 31, 2010 at 11:24 am
Script the structure and then use a tool like this:
http://www.red-gate.com/products/SQL_Data_Generator/index.htm
March 31, 2010 at 10:24 am
Try providing some detail?
March 31, 2010 at 10:21 am
When using string functions with Unicode data, make sure it is Unicode data:
SELECT SUBSTRING(N'??????????',20,1)
Notice the N prefix to the literal string.
edit: sorry HowardW, missed your post :blush:
March 31, 2010 at 10:16 am
steveb. (3/31/2010)
March 31, 2010 at 10:12 am
Hey David,
Assuming the box is licenced per-processor, would you expect any advantage to running the separate distribution databases in separate instances?
Paul
March 31, 2010 at 10:06 am
Richard M. (3/31/2010)
March 31, 2010 at 10:04 am
anshu84onnet (3/31/2010)
March 31, 2010 at 10:03 am
Viewing 15 posts - 4,516 through 4,530 (of 8,415 total)