Viewing 15 posts - 4,351 through 4,365 (of 8,416 total)
CirquedeSQLeil (4/2/2010)
Thanks Paul for that input.How do you think the Time In Service requirement should be defined?
Not sure really - I've kept out of the discussion because it's not really...
April 2, 2010 at 12:21 pm
Trey Staker (4/2/2010)
With some of the nuggets that you've posted lately and indepth discussions what don't you know? 😛 :hehe:
I am particularly weak on: Data Collector; Extended Events; Central...
April 2, 2010 at 12:08 pm
CirquedeSQLeil (4/2/2010)
Paul White NZ (4/2/2010)
A good way to prepare for the MCM 😉Don't make me laugh so hard.
Why laugh? :blink: :crying:
April 2, 2010 at 11:58 am
Jason,
Paul White NZ (4/2/2010)
April 2, 2010 at 11:54 am
I think I would be keen on a certification that had these elements:
A short piece...
April 2, 2010 at 11:51 am
CirquedeSQLeil (4/2/2010)
April 2, 2010 at 11:26 am
CirquedeSQLeil (4/2/2010)
Surprised it hasn't happened yet.
vk-kirov covered it!
April 2, 2010 at 11:24 am
Lynn Pettis (4/2/2010)
I used to be the same. Commuted to Denver from Colorado Springs for 15 years, survived on 4 hours sleep Monday through Friday.
Had to Google that to...
April 2, 2010 at 11:22 am
CirquedeSQLeil (4/2/2010)
Sounds like a gauntlet throw down there.
Just an observation 🙂
April 2, 2010 at 10:56 am
Interesting that the limit on sparse file size reduced from 64GB (Windows 2003) to 16GB (Windows 2008, Vista). There appears to be a QFE for this: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/957065
April 2, 2010 at 10:45 am
Lynn Pettis (4/2/2010)
April 2, 2010 at 10:21 am
GilaMonster (4/2/2010)
Paul White NZ (4/2/2010)
GilaMonster (4/2/2010)
'Table variables are not affected by explicit transaction rollbacks'?Operations performed on a table variable within a transaction are not undone if that transaction aborts.
Except that...
April 2, 2010 at 10:19 am
"Atypical parameters" refers to the fact that SQL Server may cache a plan based on the actual parameter values passed on the first call of a procedure. If those...
April 2, 2010 at 9:53 am
GilaMonster (4/2/2010)
'Table variables are not affected by explicit transaction rollbacks'?
Operations performed on a table variable within a transaction are not undone if that transaction aborts.
April 2, 2010 at 9:48 am
How about:
"Table variables are weird...not quite a variable...not quite a table. Go figure."
😀
April 2, 2010 at 9:42 am
Viewing 15 posts - 4,351 through 4,365 (of 8,416 total)