Viewing 15 posts - 4,261 through 4,275 (of 8,416 total)
xinyu.wang1 (4/4/2010)
why there is no big performance problem when using transparent data encryption? thanks.
You can expect 3-5% higher CPU utilization.
The primary reason that the cost is so low is that...
April 4, 2010 at 7:23 am
xinyu.wang1 (4/4/2010)
good summary
Any chance you could tone your signature down a bit? Thanks!
April 4, 2010 at 7:01 am
sql_time (4/1/2010)
Do you think sql 2005 is not capable of deleting litespeed backups?
I believe that the Maintenance Clean-up Task can only clean up backup files created directly by the Back...
April 4, 2010 at 6:59 am
gmamata7 (4/3/2010)
We have sql server 2005 EE x64 with SP3. For our production database, we have 1 mdf file & 7 ndf files of equal size in single Primary file...
April 4, 2010 at 6:46 am
Perry Whittle (4/4/2010)
SPNs can be a problem here too
I wonder if the server is clustered?
I seem to remember another possible cause related to domain membership, but can't pretend to be...
April 4, 2010 at 6:36 am
stolbovoy (4/4/2010)
Why would it help?
The record size of each row as the table is currently defined is 20 bytes.
Changing to CHAR(8) reduces the record size to 16 bytes. (20% smaller).
A...
April 4, 2010 at 6:33 am
There is a tutorial you might find useful here:
Consuming a Web Service from a SQL Server 2005 CLR Assembly[/url]
A very similar one, with pictures:
http://davidhayden.com/blog/dave/archive/2006/04/25/2924.aspx
Finally, a Microsoft sample:
Personally, I am not...
April 4, 2010 at 5:38 am
I seem to recall that this might be caused by having a space after the server name in the connection string, but there might be many possible causes.
There are answers...
April 4, 2010 at 5:02 am
gmamata7 (4/3/2010)
Whenever I ran this query, the Page Life Expectancy (PLE) drops to 3 Seconds. Is this normal? Or can I improve the above query?
Pretty normal, yes. ...
April 4, 2010 at 4:40 am
The Dixie Flatline (4/3/2010)
Including moderation.To heck with Russell's Paradox.
[font="Verdana"]Easily resolved with[/font] OPTION (MAXRECURSION ?)
April 4, 2010 at 4:08 am
Steve Jones - Editor (4/3/2010)
I'd argue that a large CRM/ERP application without FKs is just poorly designed.
It's certainly arguable 😉
On the other hand, there is an element of "well, we...
April 4, 2010 at 3:57 am
SwePeso (4/3/2010)
See what happens with pre-1900 dates using FLOAT method...
Hmmm...nasty!
April 4, 2010 at 3:28 am
The DATEADD/DATEDIFF method (using a variable for layout purposes):
DECLARE @Base DATETIME;
SET @Base = CONVERT(DATETIME, '1900-01-01T00:00:00.000', 126);
SELECT DATEADD(DAY, (DATEDIFF(DAY, @Base, GETDATE())), @Base);
April 3, 2010 at 1:20 pm
SwePeso (4/3/2010)
Don't forget what happens to dates with time portion between 12:00 and 24:00 (pm times)...
With which method Peter?
FLOAT -> INT is a truncate, so should be ok?
DATETIME -> INT...
April 3, 2010 at 1:15 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 4,261 through 4,275 (of 8,416 total)