Viewing 15 posts - 3,496 through 3,510 (of 8,416 total)
Solomon Rutzky (5/5/2010)
May 5, 2010 at 1:21 pm
TheSQLGuru (5/5/2010)
Wouldn't APPLY also force a nested loop iteration over each partition and thus also be slow?
Yes to the loop join - but that's exactly what is required 😉
Fetching the...
May 5, 2010 at 12:52 pm
Hey Wayne,
How come your 2008 server is still at RTM? You're missing some pretty important fixes :crying:
May 5, 2010 at 9:09 am
Garadin (5/5/2010)
rajn.knit07 (5/5/2010)
You have to write cursor here to update your lunchperiod data in class table from student table. First of all insert what ever data you have in class...
May 5, 2010 at 8:59 am
Solomon Rutzky (5/5/2010)
...the WHILE loop shouldn't be the best performing option, but sadly it is.
Are you sure Solomon? I would expect the APPLY + $PARTITION approach to be faster...
May 5, 2010 at 8:57 am
Chris Morris-439714 (5/5/2010)
Today's Random Worm!Fasciola hepatica
May 5, 2010 at 4:36 am
Chris Morris-439714 (5/5/2010)
Today's Random Worm!
My anti-virus package prevented me from downloading your post.
My (unrelated) thought for the day:
Oracle is really quite expensive and not half as good as they think...
May 5, 2010 at 4:35 am
hardwaremister (5/5/2010)
Yes, this is the good old and tiring issue in Sqlserver. In oracle, partitions are just faster in all scenarios...
Just faster in all scenarios eh? Sounds like magic!...
May 5, 2010 at 4:31 am
Christian Buettner-167247 (5/5/2010)
I have no idea what the following 4 digits ('0001') mean.
The second byte '01' is the sign. Can't think what the first byte is for 🙁
Paul, did...
May 5, 2010 at 4:20 am
I found a reference to back up my statement about LOBs using tempdb with INSERT:
May 5, 2010 at 3:57 am
RBarryYoung (5/4/2010)
CirquedeSQLeil (4/29/2010)
Think for yourself and question authority.Think for authority and question yourself. 😀
Question authoritative thinking.
May 4, 2010 at 11:10 pm
CirquedeSQLeil (5/4/2010)
I would like somebody do an entire blog post via twitter:-D
Jonathan Kehayias and I just did! 😉
May 4, 2010 at 9:43 pm
Thanks Wayne, that's very useful! My only remaining question is what versions of SQL Server (engine and SSMS) you are running. I guess they are similar to mine...
May 4, 2010 at 9:40 pm
Oleg Netchaev (5/4/2010)
So, sql_variant_property correctly opts for decimal base type, 10 precision and 0 scale rather than bigint base type which would yield 19 precision and 0 scale:
Hey Oleg, and...
May 4, 2010 at 12:05 pm
It seems the glass is definitely half-empty for you guys tonight! 😛
I prefer to think of the glass as being massively over-specced for the task at hand.
May 4, 2010 at 11:27 am
Viewing 15 posts - 3,496 through 3,510 (of 8,416 total)