Viewing 15 posts - 2,506 through 2,520 (of 8,416 total)
WayneS (10/11/2010)
Let's NOT go there... :w00t:
I fear it may already be too late :laugh:
October 11, 2010 at 8:42 pm
Jack Corbett (10/11/2010)
$3k is about right at this point. You can do it for less by finding a cheaper hotel and roommate.
A cheaper room-mate? :blink:
October 11, 2010 at 8:24 pm
-=JLK=- (10/11/2010)
October 11, 2010 at 8:17 pm
WayneS (10/10/2010)
And, even though the ROW_NUMBER() function does include a sort, thus presenting the data to the update statement in the proper order...
It's the order of the rows arriving at...
October 10, 2010 at 8:51 pm
Modified version that writes the result of the function call to an ordinary column:
USE Sandpit;
GO
DROP TABLE
...
October 9, 2010 at 8:31 pm
For anyone else that would like to look at this and see why T-SQL scalar functions that do data access are such a pig, here's a cut-down repro script:
USE ...
October 9, 2010 at 8:08 pm
tfifield (10/9/2010)
October 9, 2010 at 7:45 pm
Alvin Ramard (10/7/2010)
I thought the next version of SQL was going to be 2011.
That appears to be the current plan:
The Microsoft comments refer to it as SQL11 with a planned...
October 7, 2010 at 7:56 pm
GilaMonster (10/6/2010)
Reading over it after I posted it read (to me) almost like a tirade rather than an explanation.
I see. Well, I went back and read it again, just...
October 6, 2010 at 6:51 am
paul.corujo (10/30/2008)
Microsoft recommended we set our maxdop to 4.
From whom was that advice obtained, and what were the circumstances? It's not (necessarily) bad advice, but I'm interested to hear...
October 6, 2010 at 6:05 am
GilaMonster (10/6/2010)
Does anyone think my response here was over-the-top?http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/FindPost999124.aspx
No, what makes you think it might have been?
The misconceptions concerning shrinking versus truncating logs might make for a better '2sday' blog...
October 6, 2010 at 5:36 am
bitbucket-25253 (10/5/2010)
Now how many members of the thread will be coming to SQL Saturday#60 in Cleveland......
Not this time 😉
October 5, 2010 at 11:01 pm
The most useful thing at this stage would probably be an actual execution plan. Run the problem query with 'Actual Execution Plan' on, right-click the resulting graphical plan, save...
October 5, 2010 at 8:32 pm
gheinze (10/5/2010)
If another query starts at the time when query 1 is running both queries get the same rows of the temporal table and I get duplicate rows.
Have a read...
October 5, 2010 at 8:26 pm
Oliiii (10/5/2010)
October 5, 2010 at 7:41 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 2,506 through 2,520 (of 8,416 total)