Viewing 15 posts - 1,501 through 1,515 (of 8,416 total)
Karl Kieninger (11/12/2011)
November 13, 2011 at 9:14 am
I really liked this question. Not least because I didn't have to read past answer possibility #1 to get my two points 🙂
November 13, 2011 at 9:00 am
L' Eomot Inversé (11/13/2011)
November 13, 2011 at 7:48 am
Jeff Moden (11/12/2011)
Is all RBAR bad? Must all RBAR be avoided? No... Not if there's not a more efficient manner to process the data.
It all does come...
November 13, 2011 at 2:13 am
Jeff Moden (11/12/2011)
Why, Dev? What's wrong with this solution? It works perfectly for what it was designed for.
I think he was encouraging the OP not to use the...
November 13, 2011 at 1:43 am
It rather depends on whether you write the dumbest possible recursive solution or not:
WITH rCTE AS
(
SELECT 1 AS N
UNION ALL
...
November 13, 2011 at 1:16 am
Peter Brinkhaus (11/12/2011)
November 12, 2011 at 11:46 am
Peter Brinkhaus (11/12/2011)
November 12, 2011 at 11:05 am
Peter Brinkhaus (11/12/2011)
Now that's a nice little trick to remember, Paul. Very impressive improvement.
Yes, string comparisons using all the complex rules of a 'regular' collation can be very expensive. ...
November 12, 2011 at 10:41 am
Hi Peter,
To speed the LIKE and CHARINDEX solutions further, consider comparing using a binary collation:
PRINT '=== LIKE ==='
SELECT
*
FROM
dbo.Metatags
WHERE
'|' +...
November 12, 2011 at 9:23 am
chandan_jha18 (11/11/2011)
November 11, 2011 at 7:50 am
Ninja's_RGR'us (11/11/2011)
Cancel that... seems like the upgrade failed.Who said there was no risk? :hehe:
No-one - the phrase was "pretty small risk".
November 11, 2011 at 5:07 am
Hugo Kornelis (11/11/2011)
I'm afraid I don't understand how you came to that assessment.
My comment was ironic / tongue-in-cheek.
November 11, 2011 at 3:38 am
bitbucket-25253 (11/10/2011)
November 10, 2011 at 2:25 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 1,501 through 1,515 (of 8,416 total)