Viewing 15 posts - 421 through 435 (of 994 total)
Gail asked me to chime in here.
The sysindexes errors are corruptions in the statistics blobs - you should be able to get around those by dropping and recreating all your...
May 14, 2009 at 12:38 pm
Yes. Imagine a single bit corruption in the middle of a varchar column. Without a page checksum, nothing will detect the corruption.
May 14, 2009 at 9:12 am
Check this out: Importance of having the right backups
May 13, 2009 at 12:03 pm
You shouldn't be rebuilding the log - you're going to cause corruption and data loss that way. See Corruption: Last resorts that people try first....
It's likely that something in the...
May 12, 2009 at 1:46 pm
Wow - I was watching for updates on the original thread you started so missed all of this.
The FCB wait you saw is because you have activity going on on...
May 12, 2009 at 12:32 pm
You should really start a new thread for each new issue.
Your database has IO-susbsystem caused corruption in it. Run DBCC CHECKDB (yourdb) WITH ALL_ERRORMSGS, NO_INFOMSGS to find out the extent...
May 11, 2009 at 7:19 pm
ok - best bet is to call Product Support to help work out what's wrong - we're not going to be able to do it over the forums. Let us...
May 11, 2009 at 7:15 pm
ok - I've rewritten the blog post to be clearer - let me know what you think - good or bad. Cheers
May 11, 2009 at 4:37 pm
I know where you're coming from - no offense taken!
Interesting - my article is specifically about how it *wasn't* a SQL Server problem - but how bad schema/design/testing led to...
May 11, 2009 at 4:14 pm
Latest I've heard from the SQL team today is that the absolute root-cause is still being investigated.
May 11, 2009 at 2:51 pm
And also, if it turns out that what was reported originally was BS, I did caveat my blog post by saying "Now, this is slight conjecture, as I don't know...
May 11, 2009 at 12:36 pm
I know - see the edit in the post above - I thought I'd deleted it right away as it's wrong.
May 11, 2009 at 12:31 pm
Yes, it was a capacity planning issue because they hadn't tested the schema for that load. As soon as they rebuilt the clustered index to remove the fragmentation, things sped...
May 11, 2009 at 12:25 pm
Is this on 2000? If so, emptied pages in heaps don't necessarily get deallocated (freed).
Try one of: truncate table, creating a clustered index (and maybe keeping it around or dropping...
May 11, 2009 at 6:56 am
I'm guessing that's your problem then. They've just announced support for Lock Pages In Memory for 32-bit - should be out in the next month or two. See here.
[Edit: thought...
May 10, 2009 at 11:48 am
Viewing 15 posts - 421 through 435 (of 994 total)