Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 117 total)
plain wrong.
_/_/_/ paramind _/_/_/
March 1, 2006 at 7:46 am
Ok, Jeff, I'll tell you
Ever fumbled around with index fill factors? There are times when they have to be adjusted. How should a maintenance plan...
_/_/_/ paramind _/_/_/
March 1, 2006 at 7:38 am
I'm afraid you missed the goal
or do you think, i'm payed per line of code? ![]()
_/_/_/ paramind _/_/_/
March 1, 2006 at 7:30 am
definition : of course - just overpaced while planning dinner ![]()
But with the query, it is still NOT clear, whether inner or outer joins are meant. The...
_/_/_/ paramind _/_/_/
March 1, 2006 at 7:23 am
I wonder, why people always confuse CURSORS and LOOPS or whether they even know the difference...
One solution:
BEGIN TRAN
DECLARE @OrderID INT,
@OrderAmount FLOAT,
@OrderAmountScheduled FLOAT
WHILE @myAmounttoSchedule > 0
BEGIN
SELECT
@OrderID = OrderID,
@OrderAmount = OrderAmount,
@OrderAmountScheduled...
_/_/_/ paramind _/_/_/
March 1, 2006 at 6:02 am
DDL = data description language, which means the creation statements for your tables in this case.
Is the following, what you mean? :
On an event, multiple races take place(e).
For...
_/_/_/ paramind _/_/_/
March 1, 2006 at 5:33 am
Post the DDL please. For now, I recommend, you qualify your joins. SQL Qyery Optimizer interprets, true, but are your joins MEANT to be what is interpreted? e.g. INNER, LEFT...
_/_/_/ paramind _/_/_/
March 1, 2006 at 5:16 am
>P.S. What a stupid idea to have date and time 1st - separated, 2nd - in varchar!<
True. But I know where it originates
...
_/_/_/ paramind _/_/_/
March 1, 2006 at 4:34 am
Why make things simple when there are so many beautiful ways of complicating them?
I suppose, your Calendar doesn't use correct datetime-format either ...
SELECT
SUM(DATEDIFF(ss,convert(datetime, RecvdDate + ' ' + RecvdTime),convert(datetime,...
_/_/_/ paramind _/_/_/
March 1, 2006 at 4:29 am
Have you checked, whether the object is really created?
Next, are you sure, that you don't have to initiate some method on your object? I mean, you pass a parameter, do...
_/_/_/ paramind _/_/_/
March 1, 2006 at 4:15 am
Serqiy is completely right, as far as design is concerned, but if you can't change design anymore, there's still another solution:
Since you will not have an infinite number of...
_/_/_/ paramind _/_/_/
March 1, 2006 at 4:03 am
That's the >furthermore< script, monsieur, illustrating what - CETERIS PARIBUS - is meant by the omission of an unnecessary grouping and ordering, not the proposed statement.
_/_/_/ paramind _/_/_/
February 28, 2006 at 5:04 pm
I suggest you cast only one of them, the one with the extended time information. You don't have to care about the format, since internally there's no difference in the...
_/_/_/ paramind _/_/_/
February 28, 2006 at 7:51 am
I'm afraid, the table has no fields as well
Do you have a primary key that incorporates some logic, sort of identity-like procedure?
Otherwise, if...
_/_/_/ paramind _/_/_/
February 28, 2006 at 4:14 am
No, I still don't! For an obvious reason - there's no need to
Have a look at the whole thing: I did NOT...
_/_/_/ paramind _/_/_/
February 28, 2006 at 4:03 am
Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 117 total)