Viewing 15 posts - 1,246 through 1,260 (of 7,168 total)
prashanthreddymr (4/17/2013)
April 23, 2013 at 6:50 am
In SQL 2005 Trace may be your best option. If you're just looking for ad hoc then SQL:StatementStarting might catch all your cases with a filter on Text for that...
April 23, 2013 at 6:33 am
crmitchell (4/22/2013)
opc.three (4/22/2013)
crmitchell (4/22/2013)
Eric M Russell (4/18/2013)
Dree Vasquez (4/18/2013)
Hi All
If you're a member of sysadmin, then you can grant or deny whatever privillages you know are really required. You can...
April 22, 2013 at 7:41 am
crmitchell (4/22/2013)
Eric M Russell (4/18/2013)
Dree Vasquez (4/18/2013)
Thanks so much for all the suggestions. I really appreciate it.
I asked the Global developer and they said their procedures cannot be changed....
April 22, 2013 at 6:10 am
MarbryHardin (4/19/2013)
There is also the option of using a table type parameter as a container for variable and/variable length parameter lists.
Absolutely! And testing will show that shipping a TVP to...
April 20, 2013 at 8:15 am
bcsims 90437 (4/18/2013)
SQLRNNR (4/18/2013)
JAZZ Master (4/18/2013)
crookj (4/18/2013)
opc.three (4/17/2013)
SQLRNNR (4/17/2013)
JAZZ Master (4/17/2013)
Revenant (4/17/2013)
SQLRNNR (4/17/2013)
opc.three (4/17/2013)
Stuart Davies (4/17/2013)
Evil Kraig F (4/16/2013)
SQLRNNR (4/16/2013)
UniverseEgos
Id
Sequence
helix
double
mint
truffle
Fries
Chili Cheese...
hot dogs
ANGUS
KOBE
Achilles
April 18, 2013 at 11:14 am
WITH EXECUTE AS can fall down if there are cross-database calls.
To answer your question, yes, there is a way to setup your database security such that the Database User only...
April 17, 2013 at 5:57 pm
1. CHECKSUM would likely catch straight mods to a page outside the engine. That's their reason for existing. Point was that the engine is supposed to disallow out-of-bounds data values...
April 17, 2013 at 3:45 pm
It ensures that data in your columns adheres to that column's data type. Nothing more really. But once you run it once WITH DATA_PURITY you'll always get those checks out...
April 17, 2013 at 3:28 pm
Definitely run in prod. Chances are good if it ran clean off the restored copy it will run clean in prod. CHECKDB is not going to make mods to your...
April 17, 2013 at 3:20 pm
SQLRNNR (4/17/2013)
JAZZ Master (4/17/2013)
Revenant (4/17/2013)
SQLRNNR (4/17/2013)
opc.three (4/17/2013)
Stuart Davies (4/17/2013)
Evil Kraig F (4/16/2013)
SQLRNNR (4/16/2013)
UniverseEgos
Id
Sequence
helix
double
mint
truffle
Fries
April 17, 2013 at 12:55 pm
Stuart Davies (4/17/2013)
Evil Kraig F (4/16/2013)
SQLRNNR (4/16/2013)
UniverseEgos
Id
Sequence
April 17, 2013 at 7:40 am
Given that this was a 2000 DB and UPDATEUSAGE had not been run, it compels me to ask you if you have ever run CHECKDB WITH DATA_PURITY. If you have...
April 15, 2013 at 9:54 am
I am not in a place where I can test, but it seems like simply adding a .* before and after the regex that matches your CC# pattern would make...
April 15, 2013 at 8:31 am
You're using an undocumented proc. See if the documented proc I mentioned will be more helpful or research differences in the interface for the one you are using on 2012.
April 15, 2013 at 8:30 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1,246 through 1,260 (of 7,168 total)