Viewing 15 posts - 6,631 through 6,645 (of 7,168 total)
Bob Beauchemin said no:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/sqlnetfx/thread/edf53293-d8f5-4a3c-b395-d9d53d255dd6
April 19, 2011 at 11:50 am
I see the issue now...I assumed the query was telling us something specific about the section of VAS not allocated to the buffer pool, as set by using the -g...
April 19, 2011 at 11:02 am
Tomas Bergvall (4/8/2011)
That database server is really fast (120GB RAM and 24 Intel Xeon 2,4GHz CPU's).
Per the original post the DB server in question has 120GB physical RAM.
That's beside the...
April 19, 2011 at 10:36 am
asso.al-hamawandi (4/18/2011)
April 19, 2011 at 10:28 am
Here is why it looks odd to me. If he truly has 8,442,427,040 KBs of VAS free that translates to ~8 Terabytes. Is my math wrong? Or am I being...
April 19, 2011 at 10:19 am
Tomas Bergvall (4/19/2011)
I tried setting MemToLeave in increments without any difference in execution time. I even tried setting it to 2GB without noticing any performance gains.
In your earlier post you...
April 19, 2011 at 10:07 am
I am excluding the "XML PATH" method from consideration as a generally accepted way to solve the group string concatenation problem. The "XML PATH,TYPE" method outperformed it in most cases...
April 19, 2011 at 9:38 am
Originally I was not going to include the "XML PATH" method considering the method escapes the five characters shown in an earlier post. I thought think it less useful than...
April 18, 2011 at 3:47 pm
Thanks mister.magoo, those are the goods!
Jeff Moden (4/15/2011)
opc.three (4/15/2011)
...
...
Here are my results after making those changes for two different size sets...
April 18, 2011 at 9:46 am
Tomas Bergvall (4/18/2011)
I'm not entirely sure of how to view the MemToLeave setting but I tried this post http://www.johnsansom.com/index.php/2009/03/sql-server-memory-configuration-determining-memtoleave-settings/#axzz1JsE4avf6
and got the following result from the SQL. Is it possible...
April 18, 2011 at 9:13 am
Agreed on procs, I think it is seen as a black box. It's not like T-SQL where it can be broken down by statement. Just throwing it out there in...
April 18, 2011 at 8:56 am
Terminology gents...internal vs. external multi-threading perhaps?...in this case .NET multi-thread != SQL Server parallellism...different scopes. Using a CLR method does not prevent SQL Server from employing parallelism in a query...
April 18, 2011 at 8:22 am
Craig Farrell (4/15/2011)
opc.three (4/15/2011)
Fine...into rabbit hole 🙂 What is your MemToLeave setting on both instances? -g on your startup options.
Awww, OPC, if I didn't know better, I'd say you weren't...
April 16, 2011 at 8:02 am
Viewing 15 posts - 6,631 through 6,645 (of 7,168 total)