Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 47 total)

  • Reply To: Primary Key and Clustered Index

    In my previous post I wasn't making any point at all about portability, which I agree is no necessary consideration in designing a database. My point was just about SQL...

  • Reply To: Primary Key and Clustered Index

    Business data belongs to nominated data controllers and data subjects. Data does not belong to database designers and developers and as a technology professional myself I try to keep that...

  • Reply To: Primary Key and Clustered Index

    Acount Numbers do sometimes change - for example in the case of identity theft a customer may want to change his/her account number. However it surely ought to be unique...

  • Reply To: Give Up on Natural Primary Keys

    Jeff Moden wrote:

    nova wrote:

    Don't get distracted by the arbitrary idea that one key or other has to be primary key. In practical terms it doesn't matter which of the keys in...

  • Reply To: Give Up on Natural Primary Keys

    Jonathan,

    Yes of course, that's what hmbacon is saying. Not to identify and implement the natural keys would be a serious mistake. Natural keys are almost essential and it's difficult to...

  • Reply To: Give Up on Natural Primary Keys

    Some great points there, hmbacon. The problems you describe happen when developers look at things only in the abstract and lose sight of the fact that databases succeed or fail...

  • Reply To: The Sequel to SQL

    Hi Rick,

    Did you misread me? I didn't say without DBMS, I said the innovative stuff tends not to use SQL DBMS, meaning the traditional SQL-only engines made by Oracle, Microsoft...

  • Reply To: The Sequel to SQL

    Agreed. Elasticity rather than cost is very often the clincher when it comes to cloud. But whether cloud or on-prem it seems to me that most of the interesting and...

  • Reply To: Give Up on Natural Primary Keys

    Hi Roger,

    Maybe this off-topic part of the discussion has gone on a bit too long, but on a matter of terminology, maybe you might make yourself clearer if you avoided...

    • This reply was modified 4 years, 8 months ago by  nova.
  • Reply To: Give Up on Natural Primary Keys

    Thanks X. There is a (perhaps understandable) tendency for technologists like us to stick with "patterns" as a substitute for the more fundamental issues. Sometimes you have to deal with...

  • Reply To: The Sequel to SQL

    Jeff Moden wrote:

    However, while that is certainly true and very valuable to companies of that size, most companies will never come close to needing the requirements that Amazon, EBay, and other...

  • Reply To: The Sequel to SQL

    Jeff Moden wrote:

    nova wrote:

    However,  all of the important innovations in data management over the last 6-10 years have happened outside the core "SQL DBMS" space. I suspect that will continue to...

  • Reply To: The Sequel to SQL

    There's definitely truth in the idea that a wave of tools aimed at generalist users (e.g. Notebooks like Jupyter and Zeppelin; platforms like DataIku) are continuing to broaden the scope...

  • Reply To: Give Up on Natural Primary Keys

    A key is a key whether it is implemented using a PRIMARY KEY constraint, UNIQUE constraint or other means. Referential integrity is something else because not all keys are referenced...

    • This reply was modified 4 years, 8 months ago by  nova.
  • Reply To: Give Up on Natural Primary Keys

    Hi Steve

    Natural keys serve a very different purpose to surrogates so it's pretty meaningless to say one is "superior" to the other. You will need both. If my patients are...

    • This reply was modified 4 years, 8 months ago by  nova.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 47 total)