Viewing 15 posts - 931 through 945 (of 5,103 total)
There are several cases (BUGS) which could make that problem happen and some of them are documented in the MS KB.
EX:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/954054/en-us
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/951120/en-us
There is also the possibility that someone/something changed the...
September 15, 2008 at 12:17 pm
All these numbers are really tied to the hardware capacity unless they are expressed in "%" .
You should check for "hard" numbers AFTER you have established a base line.
September 15, 2008 at 11:48 am
sql guy (9/15/2008)
September 15, 2008 at 11:44 am
PeterG (9/15/2008)
Does anyone see a problem with the following update query? The last time i ran it, i killed the query after 3 hours. It is currently running and...
September 15, 2008 at 10:32 am
Adrian Robertson (8/6/2008)
I have done some digging...
September 15, 2008 at 8:17 am
Toby White (9/11/2008)
September 15, 2008 at 7:44 am
rbarryyoung (9/9/2008)
keymoo (9/9/2008)
...but I am seeing rows applied at the subscriber before the transaction has fully committed.
Hmm, I note that "seeing rows applied at the subcriber" is not necessarily...
September 15, 2008 at 7:41 am
marty.seed (9/12/2008)
ID Amount
1 ...
September 12, 2008 at 8:23 am
keymoo (9/9/2008)
noeld (7/23/2008)The parameter that you are looking for is SET in the "LogReader" which can split the transactions using -MaxCmdInTran
Thanks but from BOL it says the following:
-MaxCmdsInTran number_of_commands
Specifies...
September 9, 2008 at 2:12 pm
Just for an example I had to find some "bad" dates (.... "24:00:00") that crippled a some random rows in a large table (500+ million rows) and locking the table...
September 5, 2008 at 3:29 pm
You can use EXECUTE AS to specify an account that has the required permissions and then grant execute permissions to your user.
Note: Trustworthy ON is necessary!!
September 4, 2008 at 3:04 pm
Any "bcp" or "bulk insert" activity ? these do *not* fire triggers unless explicitly told to 😉
September 4, 2008 at 2:57 pm
Totally agree with David. You will probably be better off upgrading to 64 bit.
Some suggestions:
* Install Performance Dashboard and try to see which are the queries that affect you...
September 4, 2008 at 2:45 pm
NOLOCK does have its uses! The main problem is that many tend to abuse it or use it where is not really appropriate.
September 4, 2008 at 2:22 pm
Renaming a server does *NOT* necessarily requires reinstall.
How to: Rename a Computer that Hosts a Stand-Alone Instance of SQL Server 2005
September 4, 2008 at 2:14 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 931 through 945 (of 5,103 total)