Viewing 15 posts - 661 through 675 (of 5,103 total)
This was very nice. A point to keep in mind though is the "dreaded" TEXT columns, these "animals" are hard to handle at least with the current scripting capabilities. and...
* Noel
January 21, 2009 at 9:55 am
You would be surprised how many Docs want to be developers / IT guys.
Ahhhh..... remanesing ... My first job was a re-write of one AccessDB created by "smart" Doc...
* Noel
January 16, 2009 at 3:54 pm
usman.tanveer (1/16/2009)
But what is this limitation all about? and why is this error occuring? and what will be happening (with sql server,...
* Noel
January 16, 2009 at 3:22 pm
sunny Brook (1/16/2009)
Yes, noeld is correct. It can be done to logshipping SQL 2005 DB to a SQL 2008 Server.
Connect to the SQL2005 instance...
* Noel
January 16, 2009 at 3:18 pm
That information is actually not correct.
You CAN do LogShipping from 2005 to 2008 (without STANDBY mode)
You are requiered to use SQL 2008 UI tools ... if You want...
* Noel
January 16, 2009 at 2:44 pm
Bryan Whitaker (1/16/2009)
Can a CHECK CONSTRAINT be created that, when triggered,...
* Noel
January 16, 2009 at 1:58 pm
Use Unc Path for the T: drive instead.
\\ServerName\ShareName\File.txt
* Noel
January 16, 2009 at 1:55 pm
How about?
IF OBJECT_ID('Store') IS NOT NULL
DROP TABLE Store
go
CREATE TABLE Store
(Id Int,
Metadata XML)
Go
Insert Into Store Values (1, '<store>
...
* Noel
January 16, 2009 at 1:48 pm
Good Luck
* Noel
January 16, 2009 at 1:22 pm
usman.tanveer (1/16/2009)
I have sql server 2000 server. My log file is full of following error,
"This SQL Server has been optimized for 8 concurrent queries. This limit has been exceeded...
* Noel
January 16, 2009 at 1:18 pm
If it is not obvious you are posting SQL Server 2000 on a SQL Server 2005 forum ... The links and opinion above may or may not be valid for...
* Noel
January 16, 2009 at 1:06 pm
I have to admit that the SAN I have worked with in the past were managed by people really trained for it and they were TOP Vendors (HP, HITACHI).
* Noel
January 16, 2009 at 11:59 am
.... you might as well use a floppy and I'd still expect it to be quicker!
Now that's FUNNY :D:D:D:D
* Noel
January 16, 2009 at 11:36 am
GilaMonster (1/16/2009)
You don't need the distinct in that, because of the group by.
For some reason the PO is not understanding...
You don't need the "DISTINCT" keyword on that query!
* Noel
January 16, 2009 at 11:00 am
Viewing 15 posts - 661 through 675 (of 5,103 total)