Viewing 15 posts - 661 through 675 (of 5,103 total)
This was very nice. A point to keep in mind though is the "dreaded" TEXT columns, these "animals" are hard to handle at least with the current scripting capabilities. and...
January 21, 2009 at 9:55 am
You would be surprised how many Docs want to be developers / IT guys.
Ahhhh..... remanesing ... My first job was a re-write of one AccessDB created by "smart" Doc...
January 16, 2009 at 3:54 pm
usman.tanveer (1/16/2009)
But what is this limitation all about? and why is this error occuring? and what will be happening (with sql server,...
January 16, 2009 at 3:22 pm
sunny Brook (1/16/2009)
Yes, noeld is correct. It can be done to logshipping SQL 2005 DB to a SQL 2008 Server.
Connect to the SQL2005 instance...
January 16, 2009 at 3:18 pm
That information is actually not correct.
You CAN do LogShipping from 2005 to 2008 (without STANDBY mode)
You are requiered to use SQL 2008 UI tools ... if You want...
January 16, 2009 at 2:44 pm
Bryan Whitaker (1/16/2009)
Can a CHECK CONSTRAINT be created that, when triggered,...
January 16, 2009 at 1:58 pm
Use Unc Path for the T: drive instead.
\\ServerName\ShareName\File.txt
January 16, 2009 at 1:55 pm
How about?
IF OBJECT_ID('Store') IS NOT NULL
DROP TABLE Store
go
CREATE TABLE Store
(Id Int,
Metadata XML)
Go
Insert Into Store Values (1, '<store>
...
January 16, 2009 at 1:48 pm
Good Luck
January 16, 2009 at 1:22 pm
usman.tanveer (1/16/2009)
I have sql server 2000 server. My log file is full of following error,
"This SQL Server has been optimized for 8 concurrent queries. This limit has been exceeded...
January 16, 2009 at 1:18 pm
If it is not obvious you are posting SQL Server 2000 on a SQL Server 2005 forum ... The links and opinion above may or may not be valid for...
January 16, 2009 at 1:06 pm
I have to admit that the SAN I have worked with in the past were managed by people really trained for it and they were TOP Vendors (HP, HITACHI).
January 16, 2009 at 11:59 am
.... you might as well use a floppy and I'd still expect it to be quicker!
Now that's FUNNY :D:D:D:D
January 16, 2009 at 11:36 am
GilaMonster (1/16/2009)
You don't need the distinct in that, because of the group by.
For some reason the PO is not understanding...
You don't need the "DISTINCT" keyword on that query!
January 16, 2009 at 11:00 am
Viewing 15 posts - 661 through 675 (of 5,103 total)