Viewing 15 posts - 4,126 through 4,140 (of 5,103 total)
Sounds like client side setting issues. Are you running any antivirus on the server? Which is the rpc error you are experiencing?
* Noel
March 7, 2005 at 12:16 pm
To start if you encrypt the data you will complicate queries etc on the back-end and you could even loose the index usability (depending on the encription) on that column. On...
* Noel
March 7, 2005 at 12:12 pm
>> Sorry if I seem ignorant, but what is a bad practice? <<
To have owners on objects other than dbo.
I would like to stress though that there are very very ... did...
* Noel
March 7, 2005 at 10:00 am
I think PW is in the right track. At insert/Update time you could pass from the client the Value needed (max/min/arcosh..) then your query will be a simple select 
* Noel
March 7, 2005 at 9:56 am
1. it should be UNION ALL (not UNION).
2. I would do it with a combination of inline functions instead of UDF is the set is large
3. SQL is optimized for ROW...
* Noel
March 7, 2005 at 9:09 am
Yes you should even though it is a bad practice (everything should be owned by dbo) I would check and to change that you need
sp_changeobjectowner 'objname', 'user/role' -- preferably a...
* Noel
March 7, 2005 at 9:00 am
alternative you could use
select serverproperty('ProcessID') -- on each instance.
you can use DMO to loop through the isntances and retrieve the ProcessID property of the SQLServer object if you need...
* Noel
March 7, 2005 at 8:48 am
Both data and structure updates
It is my opinion that the UI really does not matter. you can even create a script with osql and run it using a pointer to...
* Noel
March 7, 2005 at 8:38 am
In SQL Server you have two options.
1. Repeat the expression
2. Use the expressions on a subquery like
Select .... NewAlias + ....
from ( select *, (fld1+fld2 * fld3 ) as NewAlias from...
* Noel
March 7, 2005 at 7:51 am
you don't need a join for that, just:
SELECT QtyContracted1,ContractPrice, Amount*2
FROM
(select *, (QtyContracted1*ContractPrice) AS Amount from TCA20007 ) a
HTH
* Noel
March 7, 2005 at 7:42 am
OR you could install the Developer Edition ![]()
* Noel
March 4, 2005 at 2:29 pm
the following procedures require securityadmin at least
sp_password
sp_sqlagent_msx_account
sp_revokelogin
sp_remoteoption
sp_defaultlanguage
sp_helplogins
sp_grantlogin
sp_dropremotelogin
sp_droplinkedsrvlogin
sp_denylogin
sp_addlinkedsrvlogin
sp_defaultdb
sp_droplogin
sp_addlogin
sp_validatelogins
sp_addremotelogin
the following statements also
GRANT ALL
GRANT CREATE DATABASE
Therefore you could either grant permissions to an special login (which I don't recommend) or The logins...
* Noel
March 4, 2005 at 1:23 pm
>> I think that SELECT @err = @@error will ALWAYS resolve to 0<<
Allow me to differ.
You MUST use Select @err = @@error, @cnt = @@rowcount because is the only way...
* Noel
March 4, 2005 at 1:03 pm
Just see my comments about some ways of implementing pesimistic locking mechanisms on sql server on this thread:
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/forums/shwmessage.aspx?forumid=9&messageid=152781#bm152867
HTH
* Noel
March 4, 2005 at 12:32 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 4,126 through 4,140 (of 5,103 total)