Viewing 15 posts - 3,316 through 3,330 (of 5,103 total)
>> Update by chunck... almost same thing I proposed, but you'd have to drop the actual table once the update is over... not a big problem. <<
Really the issue is...
July 7, 2005 at 1:28 pm
Are you querying a REMOTE server? .. I mean @ServerName <> LOCAL
July 7, 2005 at 1:16 pm
OR use NULLIF
SELECT value1 AS 'VALUE1',
value2/NULLIF(value1,0) 'VALUE2',
value3 AS 'VALUE3',
value2/NULLIF(value3,0) 'VALUE4'
FROM dbo.tblvalues VL
WHERE VL.ID = @ID
July 7, 2005 at 1:01 pm
Ok back from lunch.
1. >>I can't use a predefined stored proc because the program might be used on any table in any db on any server, with a variable set...
July 7, 2005 at 12:56 pm
Tough question to answer without the necessary nitty gritty details but here is what I think.
Because Batch update is not being used I would assume that some parameterizing is happening under...
July 7, 2005 at 10:48 am
SAP = Systems Analysis and Program Development
If all the above is true then that name should be an OXYMORON ![]()
July 7, 2005 at 10:12 am
What I am trying to say is that the process can be more complex than doing just a union all. If it is just a matter of purely recording what...
July 7, 2005 at 9:58 am
Because of the architecture is unknown ... as of this momment ![]()
It was not defined (yet) how does multiple record changes is going to be...
July 7, 2005 at 9:43 am
OR if you want BOTH , which is usually the case
then execute the insert twice (one for each table of course )
July 7, 2005 at 9:35 am
Are you trying to make people guess what you want?
Can you be a bit more explicit with examples and data?
select distrinct fld1, fld2
from tablex
-- or
select fld1,fld2
from tablex
group by fld1,...
July 7, 2005 at 9:27 am
Sorry about the bad news but it is not freeware anymore ![]()
Though not too expensive either
...
July 7, 2005 at 9:17 am
some how the OFFLINE status is definetly being kept in master I can't figure out a possible scenario but you should look at the steps you are taking very carefully....
July 6, 2005 at 4:07 pm
Well I am not Joe Celko but I can tell you that a calculated column is not STORED in the table it is just a comodity for implementation!
Reality is...
July 6, 2005 at 3:50 pm
Wow Thanks!
It is good to know that other people are having the same problem so you keep the sanity ![]()
July 6, 2005 at 3:40 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 3,316 through 3,330 (of 5,103 total)