Viewing 15 posts - 2,716 through 2,730 (of 5,103 total)
From the information Provided is difficult to infer the reason but this is something you need to think about:
1. You are creating two records per updated records on that table
2....
September 19, 2005 at 10:17 am
Simple, a person like you "experienced", is already leaving #10 for Henderson and Tripp and if you get to know more people better than them are you going to send...
September 16, 2005 at 1:46 pm
Adam, just answer me two questions:
How long have you been working with SQL Server?
Do you consider yourself experienced with it?
September 16, 2005 at 1:34 pm
If you *really* need such functionality I would execute the code in a "separeated connection" like an SQL Agent Job, DTS, ROWSET functions or sp_OA* procedure calls
September 16, 2005 at 1:29 pm
Honeslty I have had very painful experiences being on the interviewee side of the table!
Questions like
"how good your SQL Server skills are, on a scale of 1 to 10" ?
are...
September 16, 2005 at 1:12 pm
Sorry for the bad news but SQL Server CE does NOT supports stored procedures
September 16, 2005 at 12:17 pm
Not sure about the access violation but I can tell you there are a lot of things wrong with that code (no offence)
:
1.It is...
September 16, 2005 at 11:54 am
However you cannot tell it to stop firing on delete but continue firing on inserts and updates
If you need that functionality just keep each trigger code separated
(one for insert, one ...
September 16, 2005 at 11:36 am
I don't think this type of operation is meant to be performed a lot of times of very often that's why I thought about select into
September 15, 2005 at 1:20 pm
if resources allow it use SELECT INTO
instead of insert for speed
September 15, 2005 at 1:15 pm
The real problem maybe is that we are guessing !!
I can also interpret that: each of the "column_name" is a different column ![]()
September 15, 2005 at 1:06 pm
a possible solution to pattern search may be this one:
select a.id
from
Answers a cross join searchconditions s
group by a.id
having sum( case when a.text like s.search +'%' tehn 1 else...
September 15, 2005 at 12:17 pm
NeuralC
You are correct the exists was my oversite
I stand corrected and I am glad you got the right solution from Jesper
September 15, 2005 at 12:04 pm
Who said is finished? ![]()
select @ACCOUNTTIME = case when @ACCOUNTTIME is null then 0 else @ACCOUNTTIME end
September 15, 2005 at 11:28 am
The condition should probably be:
WHERE left(column, 2) ALL (select SearchItem from SearchTable)
but then again is not a pattern match is an exact match
September 15, 2005 at 11:24 am
Viewing 15 posts - 2,716 through 2,730 (of 5,103 total)