Viewing 15 posts - 1,891 through 1,905 (of 5,103 total)
Here is what Mine says:
max worker threads Option
Use the max worker threads option to configure the number of worker threads available to Microsoft® SQL Server™ processes. SQL Server uses the...
* Noel
July 11, 2007 at 3:02 pm
yup, Well only on the ones you plan to "move" ![]()
* Noel
July 11, 2007 at 2:58 pm
I am not only asking for the service to be "ON" but also accessible from the network ![]()
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/817064
* Noel
July 11, 2007 at 2:45 pm
What indexes do you have defined on table1 and table2.
Just post the output of
exec sp_helpindex 'table_name'
* Noel
July 11, 2007 at 2:42 pm
Not *entirely* correct.
IF you run your DB in compatibility level 80 you can still use that syntax.
* Noel
July 11, 2007 at 2:39 pm
you can specify an Identity column and the a calculated column that uses that Identity value to execute a function that will return your logarithmic value.
Cheers,
* Noel
July 11, 2007 at 2:38 pm
recreate the clustered indexes specifying the "ON [Filegroup]" of the CREATE INDEX statement.
* Noel
July 11, 2007 at 2:29 pm
Great. I'll be waiting for your reply ![]()
* Noel
July 11, 2007 at 2:28 pm
try ODBCping from external machine in aloop. See is there are discontinuities ;0
* Noel
July 11, 2007 at 2:25 pm
I am not sure what version of BOL you are using but mine says:
max worker threads (A, RR) 32 32767 255
RR: Options that require a server restart before taking...
* Noel
July 11, 2007 at 2:23 pm
check syslogins' "denylogin" and "hasaccess" columns on the master database.
Cheers,
* Noel
July 11, 2007 at 2:11 pm
you will have to take periodical "snapshots" of sysprocess and look the blkby column with the lastbatch datetime. By diffing the lastbatch and current time you will probably achieve what...
* Noel
July 11, 2007 at 2:02 pm
Clustered Index Scan on large tables are *bad* too. You will need to modify your where clause to target the columns in the index or reduce somehow the filter...
* Noel
July 11, 2007 at 2:00 pm
Not exactly accornding to *many* people HT can potetially be even BAD for DB Servers. And for App Servers the gain could only go up to 30% more (remember these...
* Noel
July 11, 2007 at 1:54 pm
Have you checked SQL Server Error Log. There maybe issues with tempdb !?!
* Noel
July 11, 2007 at 1:44 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 1,891 through 1,905 (of 5,103 total)