Viewing 15 posts - 11,701 through 11,715 (of 18,923 total)
Can't monitor that. The only you can do something remotely close is to make an audit table. Then code the inserts in the sp to the audit table.
September 21, 2006 at 11:33 am
I owe my new nickname to Jeff. I'll let him explain it
.
September 21, 2006 at 10:02 am
How do you perform the date operation without reconverting back (which renders any indexing useless)?
September 21, 2006 at 10:01 am
Even if you just do Select * ...
The key columns on which you join will be duplicates since a.id = b.id. Only 1 of them needs to be returned. Also...
September 21, 2006 at 10:00 am
Try this.
SELECT UsersID, COUNT(SDDField) AS SDDField, COUNT(ETField) AS ETField, SUM(CASE WHEN CMPField = "Hello" THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS CMPField
FROM MyTable
GROUP BY UsersID
September 21, 2006 at 9:33 am
What do you need to monitor exactly?
September 21, 2006 at 9:16 am
Can you use having!!! ![]()
Why can't you use where or case in this particular statement?
September 21, 2006 at 9:15 am
Not exactly sure of what you are asking but here's one answer.
Performance wise you should always lessen the load of the server and network. So return as little data as...
September 21, 2006 at 9:13 am
There's no time datatype on sql server. I would strongly suggest you keep both the data and time 99% of the time depending on the requirements.
Also the fact is...
September 21, 2006 at 9:10 am
With what application are you going to show the report?
September 21, 2006 at 8:41 am
This is not how the data needs to be modeled... unless this is for some special report???
It should be like
XYZ1234, First
XYZ1234, Second
XYZ1234, Third
UUU3333, Hello
UUU3333, How
UUU3333, Are
UUU3333, You?
How are you going...
September 21, 2006 at 8:30 am
This does not solve the column mapping problem.
I have already coded something like this but I don't have it with me. I'll look into it tonight.
September 21, 2006 at 8:05 am
September 21, 2006 at 7:41 am
If this may be more helpfull. I think you'd be better off to do that client side. It's a very basic loop inside another loop.
Can you do this client side? ...
September 21, 2006 at 7:32 am
The only way I ever found that was doing somewhat of a good jobs was to manually alter all the objects (must be a way to automate this but I...
September 21, 2006 at 7:30 am
Viewing 15 posts - 11,701 through 11,715 (of 18,923 total)