Viewing 15 posts - 8,446 through 8,460 (of 18,923 total)
That just bout answer it... open straight in BOL...
ms-help://MS.SQLCC.v9/MS.SQLSVR.v9.en/extran9/html/d33985f7-1048-4023-83e4-274090acda78.htm
UPPER (SSIS)...
February 13, 2009 at 11:38 am
bitbucket (2/13/2009)
February 13, 2009 at 11:12 am
I can't wait to see what he'll answer to why did you / do you want to leave your current position? Oh, just because!
February 13, 2009 at 10:59 am
... and in the "you're screwed category", the award goes to : http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic656268-357-1.aspx
February 13, 2009 at 10:34 am
The other way to restore that data is to manually reenter it... that is if you keep some sort of hard copies.
February 13, 2009 at 10:29 am
That reminds me of those 2 procs... hoping you don't need to use them anytime soon :
exec sp_update_resume
exec sp_distribute_resume
February 13, 2009 at 10:28 am
Just my 2 cents, use the windows search (can scan network drives and multiple drives without making a complicated loop).
Then make sure those files are not needed
Get authorisation to...
February 13, 2009 at 7:24 am
Can't you connect to it using query analyser?
February 12, 2009 at 11:25 am
For anyone who cares to know, this behavesas stated in the explaination both for 2005 and 2008 of ma machine (latest services packs).
February 11, 2009 at 6:27 am
When was it ever logical???
February 11, 2009 at 3:26 am
... and then you probably still missed some :P.
February 7, 2009 at 8:21 pm
RBarryYoung (2/6/2009)
Lowell (2/6/2009)
February 7, 2009 at 3:31 am
I'd go the complete opposite. If the data requiresa unique index (for data quality), then go ahead and create the index. I wouldn't do a unique index just...
February 6, 2009 at 9:04 am
Viewing 15 posts - 8,446 through 8,460 (of 18,923 total)