Viewing 15 posts - 7,231 through 7,245 (of 18,926 total)
Phil Factor (1/31/2011)
January 31, 2011 at 11:30 am
January 31, 2011 at 10:22 am
djackson 22568 (1/31/2011)
RML51 (1/31/2011)
djackson 22568 (1/30/2011.....so called health care reform has reduced payments from goverment to hospitals, while increasing regulations and decreasing reimbursements from the one source they can use...
January 31, 2011 at 10:04 am
Slow moving here too... Why do you even need dynamic sql to run this procedure??
January 31, 2011 at 9:59 am
allin1 (1/31/2011)
One more question,What kind of problems/issues i have to face
If i leave my reporting environment in 2005 and move both Prod n...
January 31, 2011 at 9:24 am
why do you NOT want matching systems??
It usually causes way more problems than anything else.
January 31, 2011 at 8:58 am
Here's a question I ask myself when I feel like using hints :
Am I really smarter than the best MS engineer who had 10 000s of hours to think...
January 31, 2011 at 6:24 am
The convert needs to be executed first to do the comparaison. Hence it's impossible to use the convert for the validation because you have a no win situation.
Assuming you...
January 28, 2011 at 10:06 am
EricEyster (1/28/2011)
January 28, 2011 at 6:40 am
We're in testing phase atm for SP4.
But since there was only like 5 bug fixes instead of 50, it's less worrysome... and yet I'm more on guard than ever!
January 28, 2011 at 6:06 am
1 way to confirm this is to compare both tables on the ids. See if they match perfectly (at least recently).
January 28, 2011 at 5:44 am
it would also do this if the transaction is rolled back by the calling proc or application.
Your trigger seems fine. so unless it's manually disabled on and off during...
January 28, 2011 at 5:43 am
carloarango@hotmail.com (1/25/2011)
January 28, 2011 at 5:39 am
I'd search the KB because I'm 99% sure that this bug has been fixed. I just can't tell you when it was.
January 28, 2011 at 5:37 am
Viewing 15 posts - 7,231 through 7,245 (of 18,926 total)